Laserfiche WebLink
MPUNDS t~IEW PLANNINC COMM15510N Regular Meeting <br />Page'2'--""""'-.-'-.-""'-...~.""""-'-'...""-"""'_.-"' MeYeh_1~a.1~84 <br />~ Chairpereon Mountln noted the memo datnd 3/19/80 <br />regarding the proposed Caae Revtew Format. She asked <br />Lhae the Commisslon conalder use of the format. <br />Heake muved to remoVe Item N6 fran the tabie, Seconded 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEPT <br />by Burmalater. 7 ayes REVIEMAL P.U.D. <br />0 nays <br />OfPiclet Hose fntroduced eha ltem as an addltlonal step <br />rev(ew requested by tha Applicant and deelred by tne City <br />for thotr proposrd P.U.D. dnvelopmant. This step was felt <br />to be advantogeoue, due to tha City's development of a <br />community perk a~d tho Appllcant's Interest In develaping <br />an approxlmate 100 aore parcal. The percal In questlon and <br />under revlew fs baelcly bounded by Long Lek,e Road, County <br />Road H2, S11ver Lake Road and County Road I. The City's <br />ar.lsting zoning of the area is a cambinatlan of R-I, R-2, <br />R-4 anQ I-1. The Comprehensive Plan designatas tha area <br />mlxed P;U.D, to Include Canmercial, Public and Residenttal~ <br />Tha Applicent, in his lettar to you datad 1/9/80, hea pro- <br />posed such a sketeh proposal. Na has also Ilsted flve <br />polnts of concern, whlch he wouid ilke the C1ty to agree <br />"~ with or give him same dtraction with which he can use to <br />•~ stark hls P.U.D. process. <br />Staff recommends that you comment on his flve polnts of <br />concern and further, glve him A~ro~tlon wtth regard to eny <br />eddittonal speciflce you might,reca~nend be incorporated <br />in his P.U.D. planning procass. Thts recanmendetion that <br />the Pianning Canniss~on might meka does not ahort-clrcuit <br />the threc step P.U.D. process, but only becanes a vantage <br />poPnt for both the City and thn Applicant. The vantage <br />for the City would ba to romplete the park reloeatlon swap, <br />purchase nnd dadlcetton process end for Cha Appllcnnt, tha <br />direction neca9sary for him to start hts P.U.O, procass. <br />Glozer stated he felt the process WA4 being cut short. <br />Suggestad Yhat the ARP11~xnt stert at the Concept Stage <br />of the p.U.D. process. <br />Officlal Roxe assurad htm thet ehere was no short cuh of the <br />P.U.D. process. <br />Park Director Andarson gave a briaf ovarview oP HIs staYf <br />memo deted Nereh 17, 1980. Mr, Andersqn stated that the <br />Parks end Recraatlon Commisslon had been studying and re- <br />vlewinq the Silver Vlew Park ~ssua sinca August, 1976. <br />__ It wae the ccnaansus of thn perk Cammise~on that the re- <br />location propoeal as presented would be a beneflc to both <br />~J the developar and the Clky. Anderson further stated that <br />the current park proposol wcs arrived ac foltowfng 18 <br />mcnths of compranlse and negotlatlon wlth both the Perk <br />