My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-03-19 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
1980-03-19 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:12:04 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:23:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
At:;..... ... ~ _ ., . , <br />MOUNOS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION Regular Mcettng <br />Paye.~--°--. _..----------------°-°-----°--°°----..,°---°-^°°°°-Merch.l $a.19~80 <br />+~ Skt6a steted his concerne had been answered. 6. PRELIMINARY CONCEpT <br />' pEV~EWAL P.U,O. <br />McCarthy questioned Yhe feasibltity of the offlce (continund) <br />bulldings on the marglnal land above County Road I. <br />Further, where would tha existing pcndnd water dreln to. <br />Boxrud, oF Short-Elllott-Handrickson, statad that the <br />area would drain to tha leke and that there was capaetty <br />fur tha 260 acre dralnaga district to meat the raqulre- <br />ments of Resolutlon N983 wtYh the Applieant's report. <br />McCarthy furthar quastlonad the control of Kraus- <br />Anderson over tha land they might sall to another <br />c'evatoper. <br />Cremers staked thnt Kraus-Andarson wouid exercfse tha <br />controly of Yha final P.U.D. approvai documents. <br />?~ Glazer staYed he could eppreclate Kraus-Andarson's affort <br />%:' In this twu y~ears qf planning, but that this was the first <br />Planning Canmission raview. Glazer askad Cramers (f ` <br />'`I khere was a need for eldarly housing in Mounde Vlew. <br />i Cremers stetad he was under the bcitef that thare was and <br />that financ~ng r.ould also be obtalned. Glazer furthar <br />i '~~ questtoned whether or not we gain storage capaclty canparing <br />LJ the existing pond with the proposed ona. Boxrud stated <br />that tha City galns storaga.~ G}azer tben asked if, with <br />the enlargement of the pond, tha nutrient balance neads <br />would stay the seme. eoxrud atated that he thought thare <br />would be adequate vegetatlon around the perimetar ef the <br />pond but that if the DNN o~ fCWD wanied mare,'the City <br />could Jdst raquira'loss axcavation In certaln areas. " <br />Furthar dlscussion,cantared around the need for opan space <br />and the foeltng that the propooad lake/pond met that <br />requiremant. " <br />Mountin questtoned tha feasfbllity of tha swiminfng beach. ~ <br />Rose referred to S.E.H.'s report etating that there were <br />a number of factors. Tha flnal pl~m for the laka and <br />beach should be planned In tha P.U.D. procass. Boxrud J <br />added that on add(tlonal study mey be necessary, da- <br />pending on hcw the proposa] Is changed by outside <br />agenclas, if at ali. <br />Heeke quastioned tha need for a beach with Spring lake <br />so near. Tha zoning of tha middle 22.9 resldontiai <br />noted acras was askad. Cremers stated that ha would <br />Me wflling to go medlum density. Heake fatt thnt at <br />YIlIS tlme maybe evarythfng shouid be noted R-i. <br />~4"~ Counctl membar Forslund spoke and asked that the <br />~„~ Plaaning Commtesion give the Applicant directlon so <br />ehat he cen continue. <br />,s~~x.~,._ _ . ,~, ... ~ , ~ ,- ~ <br />. ~ ~-,~ . ~ ,~,~., » _ ~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.