My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1980-06-04 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
1980-06-04 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:12:20 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:23:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
t;, e <br />~ '(+~prypC VI.F,W PLANNING COMMiSSION REOULAR MEETING <br />• P,age 3 June 4, 1980 <br />.-..--°--~---^--------°- °---°------°-~-°-------------------- °---- °------------ ° <br />~. lOfficlal Rose informed the Comnission that the <br />"" intent of the ccntract was to limit the top-end <br />The PLanning Commission and Council would direct <br />Northwest Assaciates along with Staff~ <br />After some dtscussion, the following motion wns <br />mede: <br />McCarthy made a motSon, seconded by Fedor to <br />recortmend to the Council that the addttioneT <br />~ost due to services be9ng needed as a result <br />af morQ rafined comprehensive plan (as required <br />hy i:he Mat Councll) be granted. <br />Ayes-6 MpTION WAS CARRIED <br />Nays-0 <br />^Jnandmsat; Mpunkin made an amendmenE ta the <br />motion, seconded hy Fedor to indicate to Council <br />that the originai contract does not tontain <br />specific time lines or tusk definitian. The <br />~Planninq Cortmission requests that future contracts <br />entered into be more r.xplicit about product <br />delivery. <br />Ayes-6 MOTION WRS CARRIED <br />Nays-0 <br />Official Rose indicated to the Commission that <br />this agreement would consumate the 7and actions. <br />If the Comnission would wish to.rtwdify the proposal <br />when it was prese~ted by the deVeloper, they could <br />use a P.U.D. The UNR will not make a statement <br />regarding thts proposal unti] it is in final form. <br />Glazer wanted 1t noted in the minutes that he <br />would {~refer seeing them meet Resoluticn #983 <br />some other way as he didn`t want to see the wetlands <br />disappear. Goebel concurred. <br />6. COFlTRACT REVIEW=PlORTHWES7 A550C, <br />CASE 56-80 (AMENDMENT TO ORIQINAL <br />CONTRACT PLANNING SERVICES) <br />(MOTIQN CARRIrS) <br />~. <br />(MOTION CARRIES) <br />7, ~M & E REALTY COMPANY AGREEMENT <br />(DATED 5-30-80) . <br />After a general discussian, the following motion was <br />made: <br />l^"~Mountin made a motioq, seccnded by McCarthy to recomnend <br />vto Council the foiiowing recomnenJaCions upor, reviewal <br />of Lhe agreement proposal dated Ma,y 30, 1980; <br />Page 4- Paragraph A- insert "Exhibit N and shall <br />submit fnstead of "or". <br />: .,.: : ,, .,, : ~ ,,, . . ...:. , ,..., _._._...,. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.