Laserfiche WebLink
f~iOUDlli:; VTZ:'r! PLA[ll1IWG COMiiI~:Sti01'7 <br />Ro6ular t~•iootin~ <br />n <br />,~,.,.. <br />f^~, <br />~ <br />~ <br />~ <br />Ootobor 1,19~0 <br />Nage 'three <br />Corractinna (oontinued}: <br />Loodin ~: <br />(Seoand ~ontonco, raeoond paranraph)- <br />-~hould rQad ..no renuost from <br />~ nalehUors hu8 been made to im- <br />provo tha soru~ning and th~re <br />apparontly hae not bQan any <br />problem ~vith this in the past.'~ <br />(Amendment to the motion)- <br />-~hould read "l.oeding m4de a ' ' <br />motion" _ <br />(Second ~entoncc, £irst ;7E1!'lvrqph~ ;kS)- ~ <br />~Should rer~d "Staff chectce~l out ', <br />five lots at randum snd ..." <br />~ <br />~(Neil L~eding's'conclufling r,omme,ai:s)- <br />~paEe 4) <br />" '-Should road °F[e would aRree with <br />~ tlie 5! utilitY easement, but he ~' " <br />would like to see a petition to <br />the Oity Council for a road if <br />that is what the reaidents want - i; <br />E` it~atoad o£`a road easament,on ona <br />-~ pieeo of proporty slnoo,such an ~, <br />easAment vioald ~ive no'Mght of <br />aacesa nor would it provido for <br />° the possibility of a road in the <br />, future.° <br />~ '(1?age 5, failed motion)- <br />-IJay votos should includa the namea <br />of those who voted "nay": Mountia, <br />- ' Lo~ding, P'edor, Glazer. <br />~,(Page 5~,third line, Haalce'~ nay vote)- <br />t <br />-InEOrt "thon" batween~~should"and ' <br />"have" <br />(Page 6, agoncta item ;~7 dhauld road: <br />Loedin~ made a mot-ion that tho <br />PlannSng Commiseion vievra it contrary <br />to sound public policy to all.ovr sub- <br />divlsion uf euUaCandard x~oadc~~~ whioh <br />fniled for lack of a second to the <br />" motion. <br />',.~ ..[vMt4r , ~.,, .. :._r n r ,~. . . . :,. .,. F. . . ~,..... ~ ~ ...: ... .. . ...... . ~.,.r' a i~f:'.~. . ,. ... <br />