Laserfiche WebLink
$i~'! <br />MOUNDB VIEW PLANNINa COMM289ION Raguler Moetinq <br />Paga 6 Ootober 15, 1990 <br />-____^____________________~.~.,..___-__-__^-_._~.__-_-.._~_-_____^_____~~.___~ <br />CounoSlmembor Forelund otated that the Citv 6. Past City Counoil <br />Coun411 had appr~ved Dynanio Developera. Aatione/Lisieon <br />~'londay , oatober 29, bha Counnil will intarview Report <br />~lenninq Commiealon applioanta at ite Aqenda <br />meeting and will diecuse tha wetland ordi~~;noe, <br />Chaptex 48. <br />ofEioial Roee updated the oommieeion membe're, <br />on the Rraus-Andoreon (M 6 E Realty) propoeal <br />and reoent ohanqes in the lake deeign. <br />The Reaording Seoratary hae eubmitted her reeig- <br />n~iion nnd a copy wae de].ivered to dommfseion <br />members along with a mema from Clerk-Adminietrator <br />Pauley regarding minutea. <br />OPficial Roee r.nted th+xt ho had on Industrial <br />Development Propoeal pondinq for the next Reqular <br />Commigefon meetinq on Plovember 3. <br />Chalrperson Mountin etatad that ahe was collectinq <br />ordinancae fram neiyhboring oommunities ooncerning <br />the establiehumne of thair Flanning Commiaeionere <br />in order to maka a oomparativn studr. 3he inetruateci <br />the commieeionera to bagin developing possible rules <br />or by-laws to be dieauaeed in con~uction with Chapter <br />_ 32 at the ne~ct regular Commiseion meeting. <br />~- . <br />~ lommiasioner Loeding requested that the f.ollowing 7. Attachment Co <br />''etatement be wrltten into the minuteas minutee <br />&es Octnber Sth memo from oommiseion membere to <br />counailmembers concerning the Odle requeat. Loq8ing <br />abjecta t~ tha handling oE tha iesue in such that the <br />letter amounted to a v~te taken at an inEormal meeting <br />and that ho was n~t qiven the opportunity to explain <br />his nay vote. He requeste that the explanation <br />appear in these minutes~ "In the eventuality that <br />the City Attorney Eouad that the five foot setback <br />pravieian wae unenEorceahlp,theiPlanning Commieeion <br />would evidantly no lo:~gex have jurfediction, in whiah <br />case, the Council presumib].y wou13 want to deal with <br />the Odle requeat wlthout further reference to the <br />Planning Commiasion. I would t~ave approved the rs- <br />quest to the Council iE this eventuality had been <br />recoqnized. <br />MOTION/SECOND: 8. Adjournment <br />McC.arthy/Glazer moved to Adjourn the Oatobar 15, <br />1980, meeting. <br />Ayee-6 Nays-0 MOTION CAAAIEB <br />~ :. 1 <br />'a~eeting adj.purned at 11s.4.0'p,m. Respaofully submitted, <br />Steven A. Rosa <br />Huilding 6 Zoning OfPioial <br />