My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-01-07 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1981-01-07 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:08:54 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:24:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />' MOUNDB VIEW PLANNING COMMI68ION Reyular Meeting <br />Page 3 <br />~a_'_-"-- <br />_""""""""'-""~_~"~'--_"~ ~ ~ -"""'~_~""" Januery 7, 1981 <br />"'-"~_~-"""^"""' <br />Nay Votae (aont.)~ <br />~ Breeke~ 2) Feale adequat~ etudy hae been given <br />. to Ghe pxoposal by the Planning <br /> Commiesion. <br /> 3) Oeveloper ehouldn't be put off any <br /> longer. <br /> 4) To ineure cooperativa development <br /> between the Citp and the developer. ~~ <br /> We need to make a poeitive recommenda- <br /> tion and provide support for recommen- <br /> dation and aur coucer~~e ho the Councll. <br />Glaxer~ Feals that ~he second part oE the resol.u- , <br /> Cion is auperfluous, but does agree tvith ~ <br /> the recomnandatlon to deny. ' <br /> <br />Warren~ <br />We have given adequate study to the ~ <br /> propoeal~ that we ahould lipt our ~ ' <br /> reco~mnendations to the Counail regaxding ~ ~ <br /> waclan3s, roacla, £ire protection,. etc. ' ~ <br /> that we ehould pase this pzopoeal on to ~; ~ ~` <br />, the Council Eor the~r conei8eration. - . ' .. , ' <br />Fedore Cannot support a denial and approval ~~'~ <br />f'''~ combination in the sama motion. ' ~' ~ <br /> r <br />~~~ Mountinr Concura with previoue ~tetemente, ' <br />' ~t: <br />Motion/Secondi Hreske/Warren moved to adopt Aeeulu- ~'-~ <br />tion No. 03-81 (Exhibit R) recouunanding approval ~ ' , <br />" <br />' <br />oE the Pre liminary Miller InduaCrial Plat. , <br />~ <br />~ <br />, 4 ayee 4 Naye . MOTION FAILS ~ <br />Nay Votee~ , , ' <br />Miller: Tha wetland proteotion Sesue ehould be ~ <br /> reeolvod be£ore the parcel is 5ubdivldod~. <br />Glazerr Aqreea with Yhe ~3evaloper that P.U.D, deaignation ~ <br /> is not in the best intereste oE the City or <br />~ <br /> tbe developer and ig not <br />able to make a , <br /> recommendation without knowing the zoning. '~ ,. <br />Loeding~ A vote £or aubdivision ie a vote againet <br /> preaerving the wetlnnd. ~ ~ ~ <br />Fedori £eele that our optione in protectton o£ <br /> tha wetland would be minimal once the ' ~ <br /> parcel is eubdivided. ~ <br />~ _ <br />~. . . _.. _. ... . ~ , . . <br />4is,j: .. _ , „ ,.. ,. , <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.