My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1981-12-02 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
1981-12-02 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 4:11:01 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:24:18 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounde View Planning Co~mniesion December 2, 1981 <br />Regular Mmeting <br />--^----------------------------------------^---- Page Two <br />----------------^---- <br />~+''~ Th~re was conaidorshla diecuoeien am~ng ehe 6, Marvin Anderson <br />, Planning Commisaionera regarding the requested Conetruction Co „ <br />two curb cute, and whether it would be podeible <br />to <br />ut in <br />d <br />i <br />l <br />i <br />i Proparty Involvadi <br />p <br />a c <br />rc <br />e <br />r <br />ve, us <br />ng one cut, or a 7501 Silver Lake <br />tuzn-around, using one cut. It wae noted that Road, Variance .F.e- <br />while in the pasC two cute have occaeionally quaet (2 Curb Cute), <br />been granted, many have been denied, it wae Cond~tional Uee <br />aleo noted that Silver Lake Roa3 io a very Permit (Model Home), <br />buey etreet to try and back out on, but two Single Family, <br />curb cute would add to run-off. Case 100-81 <br />0£ficial Roea pointed out that the lot in <br />queetLon would be too tight foz a circle drive, <br />and ~hat while the developer would prefer to <br />put in a horaeahoe drive, he would most likely <br />go to a turn-axound if the two curb cute wete <br />denied, He added ttiat, if it wae the Planning <br />Commteaion's wish, they could recommend a code <br />chenge to allow two cute, and could have it <br />ready before tne developer wae ready to put Che <br />driv~way in in the Spring. He added, however, <br />that the County genaraLLy does not like two curb <br />cute <br />MoCion Sacond: Warren/McCarthy ta adopt Rmso- <br />/-~ ut on o. -81, <br />( ! <br />~'/ 6 ayea q naya Motion 4arrie3 <br />Official Roee reported that he had reeaived 7. Diecues Past Council <br />a copy of Spring Leke Park's Comprehensive Action and Next Agenda <br />Plan, and will presettt a report at the <br />Januarq meatittg. He added ehat the Plan <br />would bn available for any Commisaioner who <br />would like to reviea it. <br />Officisl Rose asked if someone fsom the Flan- <br />ning Corm„iseton would be intereaLed in writing <br />an article for the next City Newsletter. He <br />sdded he would be taking a picture of the <br />Planning Commission to go along with the article, <br />and eupgeeted that the Planning Commieaion have <br />an artLCle in each neweletter. <br />Commiesionere Warren and Miller volunteerad to <br />write an nrticle, whi.ch would bA an introducC±on <br />to ~,uhet the Plsnning Connniesion ie. <br />Motion Second;° MeCarthy/Linke to have Cou~ie- <br />s onere Warren and Miller prepare articles for <br />, '""^~ the City Newslettere, <br />~ 6 ayes 0 nays Mation Carried <br />~e,,. , . , , . , , ..,, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.