1982-07-07 PC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

,. Mounda Viaw Planning Commiaeion July 7, 1982 Regulaz Maeting Page Two -----°----°-----------------------------°----^----^~---°-------°------ ~"~~ Teohniuian Kamp~al explainad thar there araa confuei.on regardiug the east/waet praparty 11nee, but the back lot linee, running north/eouth, are correct. Mr. Hlerr added ha haa a certified ourvay, ehowing ~where hie prope!r.Cy linee are. Acting Chaixman Sreske askad Staff to check into addttions and improvemente menCioned by Mr. Belford to s~e if tha property linee are in order, and $at back to Mr, Belford, Technician Rampel explained that any front or baak yard additione would not have infringed upoe the aide ynrd aetbacke, and thue would have been approved without gatting into the problem of the eaet/west properr.y li.nes, AcCing Chafrman Breske polled Che Commissionere for their thoughtn on the proposed developmettt. Thair coffi¢ente included that other than finding a way to rectify the 10' diffexence, they felt tha developer had agreed and done everything that had baen aeked of him, that there was atill some ueetion concarning the revised drainage calcu- ~ation, and that the Riee Creek Watershed Distsict had aeked that approval be tabled unkil nn emarAencp - flow plen lias been aubmitted. ~-~ Technician Kempel po3nted aut theC approval cou].d h~ given, contingene ugon the deve7.oper meeti.ng cextain xequirem~snts set by the Planning Commission, Acting Chairman $reske otated he did not want to hold back the development for inai$nificant reaeona, but ha felt there were eQVeral ar.eae Co be addreesed still, those beittg a decisi.on on the curba, on snow remova7., a decision from the Rice Creelc Watexahed District on overf2ow„ the 1500 gallon per minute capaci.ty ~rater malLn, the Fire Aepsrtment o d¢aieion on a knook-down b~rrier, Che nort~. building being mnvad back, a valid acceso parmit to Nighway 10, and an eaaement ta the propexty to r.he eaee. Technician Kempel explained Chae undex Lha RUD pxoceas, the Planning Commission must acC withtn 60 daqs, giviug thuir :aport ar.d reccemmendaCiott to the C~,ty Council, Ha added that tf the item ie tabled, it could still be reviewad at the Auguet 4 maetAng and Ra~1 within the 60 day period. Ha added that the CRtp Council has 30 days Prom i.e's receipt Prom the Pianning Commisaion to hold a public kearin8 and act on the recomnendation. He sr.ated that undex a CUP, ehe Planning Coumiaeion hae 60 daqs from it's Piret regular meeting ; to mske a recoamnendation to the Council, whiah wonld '- given them untti tha SaptemLer 1 meet~.ng.