Laserfiche WebLink
.Mounde Viaw Planning Co~iseion Auguet 4, 1982 <br />' ' Regular Meeking <br />~' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Page Two <br />~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ <br />i"\ Technician Kampel raported the architect, Bruce G. Health Central, <br />~ <br />Tunell, hae presented plane ehawing where the Inc./Unity Medi- <br />' parking spacee would be localad, cal C~nter, 2559 <br /> Mounde View Dr., <br />Thero waL+ cor.eiuarable d:acuseion among the Development Pro- <br />Co~iaeioners regarding the n~nber of parking poeal (Eldarly <br />epaces to be required for th~ devalopment, with <br />40 Hag. Pro1ect, 40 <br />riance ' <br />) <br />V <br />U <br />:t <br />epaces. <br />the concensus baing ono per unit, or s <br />, <br />a <br />n <br /> ~equest (Parking ~ <br />Technicial Kampel stated the developex had submitted Requirements), , <br />h D <br />it <br />Hi <br />the plane to HUD showing 26 parking apacen, with ene <br />y <br />g <br />R-4, <br />HUD approving the pro~ect baeed on that eite plan. Restdenkial Dstr. <br />:~e added that per Resolution No. 58-82, 40 parking Case 1?2-82 <br />epaces would be required, while under the R•-4 eection <br />of the code, 100 parking epacea would be sequired, <br />, and while the resolution grante a variance fram 100 <br />tn 40 parking epaces, the developer ie aounting on j <br />u change order to fund the additional required <br />parking apacee, which could be added in following I <br />, cot~encement of the pro,~er,t, j <br />Mr. Tunell atated they would like to go ahead with <br />26 epaces, and if it ia felt the additional 14 spaces <br />are required once the project is completa, they could <br />add them then. He also explained the budget difficul- <br />tiea they have been having with the pro~ect, and the <br />papes•work and xed tape involved in getting HUD to <br />finance the aaditional parking apacee. <br />It was ttie cuncanaus oE the Planning ,^.ommiesion <br />that 40 parking spacas ehould be required, one per <br />unit, and it should be eent to HUD that way, with <br />the Planning Commiseion being w.Llling to meet with <br />whoever was neceasary to get the parking eituat~.on <br />res~lved. <br />Motion_Second: Warren/~~derson +to adopt Resolucion <br />o. <br />5 ayea 0 nays Motion Carried <br />ltoCion/Second: Linke/Andaraon to adopt Resolution <br />Ro.~-SZ~ <br />5 ayea 0 naye Moticn Carried <br />Mntion Second: Mountin/Warren to ~orward the infor.- <br />mat on to t e City Council, as eoon ss possible, with <br />a copy to the Planning Commieeion. <br />5 ayes 0 nays Motion Carried <br />,~ <br />