Laserfiche WebLink
i+t;..i, <br />Mounde View Planning Commioeion June 15, 1983 <br />, Bpeaial Mee~ittg <br />'.. ___-..-__-^ _....-_-_-___--..-__--_..-__-_-______.._-_^-_-.. Page Two <br />..---__..-_..-__..-_--.. <br />Chairman Mountin reviewed the Planning Cammiasion 4. Erio Emeraon <br />minutes of .7une 1 expiaining why the Commiesion 7865 B~ring <br />~deoided a vnrinnce wouid n~t be required. Cha.irman Lake Road, <br />°•~,* Mountin explained that ainae the June lstmeetinq, Varianoe~ <br />Clty etafE aontaoted the City Attorney regaroling 9ingle Family <br />thie item and it wae the Attorney's opinion that a Dietriat <br />varianoe would ba required. The Commisaioners Case 134-83 <br />did receive a copy of the Attorney'e wrltten <br />opinion. <br />Mr. Emereon drew a eketch on the board showinq <br />the location of eide yards. He then presanted a <br />.leng~hy c~see steting that the Mounda Viow munioipa,l <br />oode doee not adc~raes the location of driveways. <br />Chairman Mountin explained that a varianae ie <br />required baeed upon bcth past City practice of <br />requiring a variance for drivewaye less than <br />five Eeec from the grnperty line and also <br />ba~ed upot~ the Attornoy'e opinion that a variance <br />ie required. <br />Mra. Emer9on statied thak the driveway wae in <br />exidtence for many yeare. They are not putting <br />in a new driveway, but repairittg/replacing an <br />axiecing driveway. <br />Chairmnn Mountin axplairied 01~at the Planning <br />~'~ommiseicn ~hauld raview eida lot line vs. eid~ <br />~~,.yarda ae it relatoe to the ~laaement of driveways. <br />Commieeioner Wsrren aeked if the membere oE the <br />4lanniny Commiaeion knew they were being recorded. <br />Chairman Mountin atated that she knew she wae being <br />recordad. No other membeYS stated that they knew <br />they were being recorded. <br />Mx~. H]reteon handed the Chnirperson two a£fidavits <br />Prom two reeidsnta of Spring Lake Roa3 concerning <br />the driveway loaation. He etated that he Feale that - <br />the City deee not have a driveway code. <br />Commiasioner Plt~rren asked why the proceedingss <br />oE the ~rtaeting wero beinq recorded. Mr. Emeroon <br />etated that his attorney wanted to <br />hear what was being d,i,acueaed at tha maeting. <br />Mo~tian Secondi Fozelund/McCarthy to adopt Resolution <br />6 ayee 0 naye Motion Carried <br />The Planning Commiesion took a Eive <br />--~.Tha meeting reeumed at 8:40 p.m. I <br />~ ~'ommieainner Warran wae not preeent <br />`.heaonvened. <br />v~.:., . . , ,. „ <br />minute recess. <br />t wae noted that <br />when the Commissi~n <br />. ._ . ~, ~ <br />