Laserfiche WebLink
Mounda V~aw Planning Co~iseion November 7, 1994 <br />Regular Meeeittg F888 xWo <br />-----------------------------------------------------------°------------ <br />( ; permit, witich would require a public hearing, <br />Jim Ieaaceon, of the Firet Stata Bank of New Brighton, <br />explained thay would lika to build an acceesory <br />building, approximately 22'x26', which would be used <br />co etore tha bank's two vano dnring non-bank houre, <br />as well ae maintenance equipmenC, He added thet they <br />would incorpnYate tha garbage facilitiae with the <br />new building, <br />Chairman Mountin advteed the applicant would have to <br />requeet a co3e revie~~t, ae thera wae an ommiesion <br />during the code revi~ew and acceseory Luildinge were <br />noC covere~i for businese areae. 3ha also advieed <br />thaC the applicant would be applying to build a <br />garage, raCher thsn an accesaory building, ae <br />defined by both the eiza and intended usage of the <br />buildi.ng. <br />Director Thatcher reviewed what ia allocJable under <br />R-1 for acceaeory buildinge and gerages. He also <br />advised the msxim~uu squsre footage all~wed for <br />garagea ie 864 sf. <br />Chairman Mountin advised that in a code appeal, <br />~ the Planning 'Ao~iseion would reco~end to the <br />ti,, Council to change the ordinance. She also reviewed <br />the options available to the Planning Commiseion. <br />It wae the concensus of the Planning Cnmmission i~ <br />begin work on thie item at t4e next agenda sesei.on, <br />and ha•,U Staff prepare information from eurrounding <br />cou~unities, Blaine and New Brighton in pnrticuSar., <br />on both their garage and acceaeory building <br />requirementa. They also reca~ended looking at <br />the request as a conditional use permit requeet, <br />which vtAUld necessitate public hearinge. <br />It wae agreed that the November agenda sesai.~n would <br />be held on iuesday, November 20, due to Y,he Thanke- <br />giving holiday. <br />There wae no one preeent from Rosewood Corporation 6. Rosewood <br />to diacuss their request far a mini storage Corporation - <br />facility. Case 162-84 <br />::ation~Sncond: Anderson/I,auterbo.ch Co taUle <br />d scus~n on Case 162-84. <br />',, 5 ayes 0 nay~ Motion Carried <br />~ <br />Tlie Cowmisaioners diecuased side yaxd aetbacke and 7, Action Itema <br />the definieion of a driveway, in connection with <br />eroaion. It was the conceneus of the Co~iseioners <br />