Laserfiche WebLink
Mounde Viaw Planning Commissinn March 6, I985 <br />Regul,er Meating Paga 'rwo <br />-~--------------------^-------------^------^--------------------------- <br />~hairman Mountin pointad out Che denoity bonue wae <br />;ranted to the devalopmant in the iniCiel devalopment <br />phase, and ehe wnuld like to ede whaC that bonue wse, <br />ae they ehould have explicit information to act on <br />and send an to tha Council, She added thet when a <br />variance is requested f.or lot eize, they ehould ehow <br />the bene£iC to the cammunity in providing affordable <br />housing. <br />Fxad Hnae, of M,H. Anderaon Construction, atated that <br />when they were fir~t granted conceptual approval, Chey <br />had 112 townhouaes planned, which waa approved by both <br />the Plar.ning Cowmisaion aud City Council, but two months <br />Later they came Uack with a design chenge, changing the <br />112 townhonsee to 1b$ condominiume, which was spproved <br />by tha Council. l;e explained that in the aingle family <br />area they itad planned two-family homes along Silver Lake <br />Road ae a buffer, but now would like to put aingl.e <br />family homes in inetea$, whi.ch would be two lesa homes <br />tttan the two-fami].y izomea. He added they hacl built <br />several eingle iamily homes on 60' lote in Aloomington, <br />whiah have been very well reaeived. He stated that <br />Bloomington had approved the 60' lots due to the density. <br />Director Thatcher raported there ~.s not qutte enough <br />{,'"~creage (2.867) to meet the 3 acre need to declare a PUD. <br />°-~Mr. Haas sCated they would be able to reduce the selZing <br />price of each home bq $3,OQ0 -$4,000 with the narxower <br />lots. <br />, <br />Chairman Mountin pointed ont Chey had approved the double <br />bungelowe nrigiaally becauee that is what ~'he developer <br />had reqaested. Mr. Haas replied the presenC home ovmero <br />in the development are very opposed to having two fam•Lly <br />homes built in that area, as they £eel it will lower the <br />value of the development, and two family home residents <br />are generally more mobile. <br />Chairman Moutttin stated the major concern ie how to apply <br />an equal meaeuring etick thraughouC the co~nunity, ae <br />if this was approved, they would heve many 2evelop~ra coming <br />in requesting Che same rhing. She asked thet StafE reseaxch <br />the matter Futher, since the development hae already been <br />given the ten percent bonus for the PUA. <br />Dlrector Thatcher replied that Staff will take a look at <br />tl:e denaity question, and whrre the PUD ia meaoured from, <br />and could theq do another PUD in Chis development. <br />Motion 5econd: Miller/Forslund to table consideraCion of <br />e request ~or M. H. Andereon Constxuction, Case 7.65-85., <br />,~htil the next agenda session. /fi~,8 y <br />4 ayea 0 nays Mation Carried <br />