My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-06-05 PC Minutes
MoundsView
>
City Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1985
>
1985-06-05 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/18/2009 3:46:17 PM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:25:46 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
PROCEEDINGS Q~ THE PLANNING QOMMIS3ION <br />CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW <br />RAf19EY COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />.,M,I <br />Regular Maoting <br />June 5, 1985 <br />Mounde View City Hell <br />2401 Nwy, J.O, Mounda View, MN 55112 <br />---°------~-^---------^---------°--------°---------------------------- <br />The Mounde View Planning Cammiseion wae callad to 1, Call to Order <br />order by Chairman Mountin at 7:30 PM on June 5, <br />1989. <br />MIIdBER3 PAESENT: Coa~miseionere Zollncr, Andereon, 2. Roll Call <br />~axa u.P~3,~ oA w~y and Chairman Mountin. <br />It wae noted that Commieeioner Millar wae expected <br />to arrive later in the meeting, and Coimniseioner <br />Warren had an excueed sbsence, <br />kLSO PRESENT~ Public Worke/Community Development <br />5i~r9etor atch~r, <br />~ Motion Second; Ruwley/Foralund eo apgrova the 3. Approval of <br />ny , and May 15, 1985 minutes as prasenCe3. Minutes; <br />' May 1, 1985 and <br />5 syes 0 nays May 15, 1985 <br />Motion Carr•led <br />There were no residente requesto or commento from 4, Reaidente <br />the fl.oor. kequeeta arid <br />CommAnte from <br />che rioor <br />Director Thatcher reviewed hie memo af Mey 24 5. M. H. Andereon <br />regarding the raqueat of M. H. Anderson to amend Caee 146-84 <br />their existing PUD and aubdivide the property in <br />question into 12 eingle femily lote. He revi.ew~ed <br />the proposed eite,plane, ehowin6 both 10 lote and <br />].2 lots. <br />Fred Haae, of M. H. Anderson i:onetructi~n Co., <br />etated that at tha laet Council maeti!tg, the <br />Council wae intereated in having tho eingle fcsmily <br />rather than Cwin homes, qe there vrould be more open <br />epace snd would be more attxactive. He explained <br />that if th~y do not receive spproval for tlie 12 <br />l~single fe~mily hAmee, they would have to revert back <br />`a~ to the plan for twin homes, ae it would not ba <br />financially f~aaeible to build less than 12 homee <br />on that parce7.. , <br />f. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.