Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission January 5, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />side-yard setback. He advised that if a variance is granted, staff recommends it be no less than <br />10 feet, which is the typical side-yard setback for properties not affected by an unimproved right- <br />of-way. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the site plan provided to the Commission indicates the <br />approximate width of the proposed house, and this could be shifted slightly to allow for a 10-foot <br />setback. He explained that although staff has not supplied the Commission with a resolution for <br />this request, a resolution has been drafted which indicates a 10-foot setback, and he could recite <br />this document, if the Commission were to consider granting the variance at this time. He <br />indicated that staff has notified all property owners within 350 feet of the subject property. <br /> <br />Pam DeGross, 8133 Woodlawn Drive, stated their land backs up to Faber Street. She indicated <br />that she had spoken to staff after the subject property had been sold, and learned that the City has <br />been discussing the different development possibilities of the “big woods”. She indicated they <br />have determined some possible solutions for what is occurring in this area. <br /> <br />Mrs. DeGross stated they own approximately 2 acres of land, and are considering building four <br />houses on this property. She stated a portion of their land abuts Faber Street; therefore, they <br />could also utilize it as a right-of-way. She indicated they are interviewing several developers to <br />determine their interest in developing that land. She requested the Commission consider this, <br />adding that if the City begins to grant variances, they will require variances as well. <br /> <br />Dan DeGross, 8133 Woodlawn Drive inquired regarding which lots the applicant owns. <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the applicant owns Lots 2 and 3. <br /> <br />Mr. DeGross stated they plan to develop their property as well, and will also require an exit. He <br />stated the applicant proposes to construct a driveway adjacent to unimproved Laport Drive, <br />however, the City has denied other attempts to develop this area for at least 25 years. He <br />requested the Commission consider this, in conjunction with the existing development in the area <br />where Woodlawn Drive goes through to Arden Street, and attempt to tie all of these <br />developments together. <br /> <br />Mrs. DeGross indicated that if the applicant is permitted to construct a driveway where an actual <br />City road should be, they will have to request right-of-way from the applicant’s driveway to <br />access the back of their property in order to build. She commented that this road should be <br />developed into a full-sized City street with fire hydrants and other amenities. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired why the previous requests to build in this area were denied. <br /> <br />Mr. DeGross explained that in the past, the wetlands were in closer proximity to the property, <br />and they have been receding, however, they could also come back. He presented the <br />Commission with an alternate development proposal he had drafted. <br />