01-05-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission January 5, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 5 back yard, and he had advised them that if all went well at the meeting, he would be willing to proceed with this. Mr. DeGross suggested that if the property along Laport Drive were divided into three parcels, all of the property owners would have larger lots. Mr. Mistelske stated he did not own Lot 4, and therefore, had no control over it. He added that he did not believe it was a buildable lot, and inquired regarding its size. Chairperson Peterson stated the 75-foot frontage width was acceptable; however, the length of the lot does not allow for sufficient square footage. Planning Associate Ericson advised that this lot is approximately 9,890 square feet in size. Mr. Mistelske stated the wetlands were a major consideration when he purchased his land. He explained that the wetlands are in very close proximity to his property, and constructing a street would not be feasible, unless the wetlands recede at some point in the future. Chairperson Peterson advised that wetland boundaries are not defined by their present location, but rather, are examined on an historical basis. He explained that soil borings are taken to determine the soil types and the types of vegetation that have grown in the area for in the past 50 years or so. Commissioner Kaden inquired if a delineation of the wetlands had been performed. Mr. Mistelske presented the Commission with the wetland delineation. Planning Associate Ericson explained that the site plan indicates the approximate location of the 100-foot wetland buffer line. Mrs. DeGross stated they would certainly encounter difficulties in attempting to obtain an easement on the applicant’s driveway, as it is proposed to be located on a potential City street. Planning Associate Ericson advised that the Limited Use Agreement allows the applicant to take access from this area, and no one else. He stated it is not contemplated that any other parties would take access at this location. Mrs. DeGross stated that because this proposal has come forward, they would build on their property, and the street would have to be developed. She inquired who would be responsible for the cost of developing the street. Planning Associate Ericson stated the developer would be responsible for the development of the street. Mrs. DeGross inquired why the applicant would not be responsible for this, as he would be developing his land, and using the road as his driveway. Planning Associate Ericson explained that pursuant to the agreement, when the street is constructed, any and all appropriate fees would be assessed to the applicant, however, this was to