01-05-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission January 5, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 8 three feet of that indicated on the applicant’s delineation, however, without seeing the results of the wetland study, it is simply an estimate on the part of staff and the City Engineer. He added that it is not believed that the lots located on the north side of unimproved Laport Drive would be developable, even with a favorable delineation. Commissioner Johnson inquired if this was due to the size of these lots. Planning Associate Ericson stated it was not, but rather because of the conditions of the soils, and their proximity to the wetland, which would not support housing. He advised that these were City controlled lots, and no development could occur without the City’s interaction, at some point. Chairperson Peterson inquired who owned the land to the north of unimproved Laport Drive. Planning Associate Ericson explained that the City controls these lots, and retains Use Deeds on them for drainage purposes, however, the State of Minnesota owns the property. Chairperson Peterson stated it was somewhat difficult to determine the highland trees from lowland on the aerial photograph, however, it appears to indicate a natural boundary line along the Laport Drive right-of-way. He stated that since there is a potential for possible development and the improvement of Laport Drive, further discussion should take place, prior to acting upon this matter. Commissioner Stevenson inquired regarding the time frame for consideration of this request. Planning Associate Ericson stated in order to meet the 60-day requirement, the Commission should take action by February 14 or 15 at which time the City could request an additional 60- day extension. He explained that he did not anticipate there being a need for this, as there was certainly sufficient time for another meeting, prior to acting upon the matter. Commissioner Kaden stated that it appeared the DeGross’ could develop the back portion of their lot, and if they do so, there is a good chance that Faber Street could be improved. Chairperson Peterson noted that Lund Construction Company owns one of the lots on Woodlawn Drive, and it was likely they would be interested in developing this property as well. Mr. Mistelske stated that if the DeGross’ build as they have indicated, and Faber Street and Laport Drive were improved, they would both be assessed a very substantial amount for these two roads. He stated he would likely be unable to afford such an assessment. Commissioner Johnson stated if Faber Street were improved, it would be done at the expense of the developer. Planning Associate Ericson advised that there are formulas to determine assessments, and because Mr. Mistelske would benefit from the frontage, which would be considered an improvement to his property, he would also be assessed for this. Mr. DeGross inquired if Tax Increment funds could be utilized for such an undertaking.