My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-16-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:27:42 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:27:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 13 <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired who had determined the locations of the signs. <br /> <br />Mr. Cronin stated the sign locations were chosen by the City. He stated he was not certain if <br />these locations were set around certain features that the City desires to preserve around the golf <br />course, or if they were selected because of the wetland on the western edge of the property. <br /> <br />Mr. Cronin requested the Planning Commission approve staff’s recommendation, and allow <br />them to proceed to the City Council, and begin to implement the decision the City made with the <br />adoption of the ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the most westerly sign, in closest proximity to the Sysco <br />property could not be moved 500 feet, because of the wetland. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson advised that there are many lowlands on a portion of this property, and the <br />sites may have been selected, because of their accessibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson pointed out that as billboards go, the proposed billboards are very <br />attractive. He inquired if the Commission should set a design standard that others would have to <br />comply with, adding that the City requires developers to consider the design of existing <br />structures. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the City Code does not contemplate the design of the <br />billboards. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired if they could require the applicants to comply to a design <br />standard, as with any other similar situation. Planning Associate Ericson stated they could <br />attempt to. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the locations of the proposed signs were selected with regard <br />to the different features of the golf course, and the presence of the lowlands and wetlands in the <br />northern area of the property, toward Sysco. He explained that there was some reason for <br />choosing these particular sites, which is not to say there could not be alternative locations, <br />however, these are the sites that the City and Golf Course Superintendent, John Hammerschmidt <br />felt would be the best for the golf course. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired if at the time the City decided upon a proposal for six billboards, <br />there was any consideration regarding what Sysco might desire. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated there was not. He explained that Sysco applied for their <br />permit the previous day, February 15, and at that time, the City had already made its application, <br />and could not have known that Sysco would be making a similar application. He noted that the <br />City was aware that this possibility existed, however, they set the sign locations prior to any <br />knowledge of Sysco’s application.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.