My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-16-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
02-16-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:27:42 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:27:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated all properties within 350 feet of the golf course property were <br />notified. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if there were five of these properties. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained there are more than five properties, which include many <br />City- owned properties on the south side of Highway 10, Sysco, and some properties north of the <br />golf course, in Blaine, which were notified as well. He stated all properties within 350 feet of <br />the subject site were notified. <br /> <br />Ms. Olsen inquired if the five houses located to the south of the golf course were within 350 feet, <br />and if they had all received notification. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated it was his understanding that notices were mailed to these <br />residents. <br /> <br />Ms. Olsen inquired if Eller Media has provided a cost estimate for the construction and <br />installation of the two signs proposed for the golf course, itself. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated at this time, he did not believe anything specific had been <br />decided, in terms of the type of City golf course signage that would be approved. He stated the <br />golf course signs are not a part of this application, because they are allowed with the ordinance <br />that was adopted the previous year. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson pointed out that there was a connection between these two proposals in the <br />sense that the financial offer that is made by this company helps the City toward the design and <br />construction costs of the signs currently under consideration. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated with regard to whether or not the City Council <br />could approve this item without a recommendation of the Planning Commission, Section <br />1125.01 of the ordinance indicates “The Planning Commission shall make a finding of fact and <br />recommend such actions or conditions relating to the request, as it deems necessary to carry out <br />the intent and purpose of this title.” He advised that the following paragraph indicates “The City <br />Council shall not grant a conditional use permit until it has received a report and <br />recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City staff, or until 60 days <br />after the first regular Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which the request was <br />considered.” He explained that according to the ordinance, the City Council could rule on a <br />conditional use permit, after 60 days from the first Planning Commission consideration of the <br />matter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated page 5 of Eller Media’s proposal indicates the statement “We <br />propose the two most westerly signs on the edge of the wetland area be originally constructed as <br />standard monopole billboard structures, and then, be converted to this design when the golf
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.