02-16-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 20 with this requirement, even if they were 500 feet away from one property line. He stated the Commission should make a recommendation in this regard, and the other points brought forward. Commissioner Stevenson stated the two possible actions would be to table the resolution as presented, or attach a recommendation to the resolution indicating that an application has been made by Sysco for two billboards on their property, and that the proposed locations be revisited. Commissioner Johnson suggested they table the resolution and take the matter up again at the next meeting. Commissioner Laube stated they should table this resolution, direct staff to prepare a new resolution that they agree to as amended, pursuant to the current discussion, and provide this to the City Council at their next meeting. Chairperson Peterson stated it appeared to be the consensus of the Commission that this item be postponed until their next meeting, at which time, the two applicants may have determined some means to accommodate their purposes. He stated they should include a recommendation in the resolution that indicates that the applicants should retain control over the content of the signs, as per the lease agreements. He indicated they should also recommend the Council address the issue of sign construction, to make the monopole signs for the westernmost billboards more compatible to the other billboards. Commissioner Johnson stated there should also be standards that relate to the appearance of the billboards as well, and that the brick design be continued throughout all of the billboards. MOTION/SECOND: Stevenson/Berke. To Table Consideration of Resolution No. 606-00, Until the March 1, 2000 Meeting of the Planning Commission. Ayes – 8 Nays – 0 The motion carried. Chairperson Peterson summarized that they were left with the issues of placement, construction and content of the signs, as well as testimony from the audience member regarding a disagreement with staff’s conclusion that the property values would not be degraded. He stated these were issues for staff and the two applicants. He requested clarification regarding whether or not the City was applying for the permit on behalf of Eller Media. Community Development Director Jopke advised that the Interim Use Permit is issued to the City, as the property owner, and the City is the applicant. David Jahnke, 8428 Eastwood Road stated he had attended the previous Council meeting. He indicated he had seen the Planning Commission meeting on television, and had seen that the Commission was about to table this item. He advised that at the Council meeting, Golf Course