Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission February 16, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 25 <br /> <br /> <br />however, by leaving it open ended, the Planning Commission would allow the Council to <br />determine the means to accomplish this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired if they had language to indicate that Sysco’s signs should match <br />the signs that have been presented. Commissioner Stevenson stated this should be addressed at <br />the time the Sysco application comes forward. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland pointed out that they were requesting Sysco and the City to work out the <br />property line issue, therefore, it would appear to be appropriate to provide a recommendation in <br />this regard at this time as well. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller stated it would not be necessary to require the signs be identical. <br />Commissioner Hegland stated they should be complimentary. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated these signs are not before the Planning Commission at this time. <br />Chairperson Peterson added that there is not even a formal application at this time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated the Commission members all appeared to be in agreement that <br />something should be included pertaining to the content of the signs. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this language could indicate, “It is the Planning Commission’s <br />recommendation that the property owners add a clause to their lease agreement stating that they <br />retain the right to remove objectionable signage.” He pointed out that if both property owners <br />could retain that right, this was probably the best that could be expected. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson stated the time to make this recommendation would be when Sysco <br />comes before the Planning Commission with their proposal. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that even if there are legal reasons this is not addressed in the <br />ordinance, it could be added to the lease agreement. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson inquired if the Planning Commission was recommending that a <br />resolution be drafted, or that staff simply sit down with the Council and provide a report on the <br />Planning Commission’s recommendations with regard to these items. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated this would be appropriate, adding that staff should convey the <br />Commission’s reason for tabling this item, which essentially is that they are not ready to vote on <br />the matter at this time, because of these issues. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson provided a summary of the items that the Planning Commission <br />would like to have addressed with the Council. He stated the first item pertains to the spacing of <br />signs with relationship to the Sysco property, the second item is that all signs be of similar