My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-01-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
03-01-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:28:00 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:27:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 1, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 15 <br /> <br /> <br />had been clarified at the previous meeting, however, he would like to have this reiterated, in <br />terms of how this action differs from the Planning Commission’s opposition to the billboards. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that in December, the Planning Commission was requested <br />by the City Council to consider the possibility of allowing billboards in a particular section of <br />the City. At that time, the Commission’s finding and intent was very clear, in that it felt this was <br />not an acceptable use. The Commission passed a resolution indicating their findings, and <br />forwarded this to the City Council. The City Council acknowledged the Planning Commission’s <br />feelings on this item, and proceeded to adopt Ordinance 644, which amended the City Code to <br />allow for billboards, which are now a permitted use in this section of the City, as long as certain <br />criteria are met. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated one of the roles of the Planning Commission is to review <br />applications in terms of the City Code. He indicated the Commission was considering the <br />application before them in terms of whether or not it meets with the requirements of the Code, <br />and not in terms of whether they desire or approve of billboards, about which, they have been <br />very clear. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated at the last meeting of the Planning Commission, a resident had <br />spoken with regard to the siting of billboards across the highway from her property, and had <br />indicated she found this to be objectionable. He inquired if any similar objections had come <br />forward. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he was not aware of any. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube stated he had spoken with a property owner who resided at 2411 Laport <br />Drive, who expressed his disappointment that not all the residents on the north side of Laport <br />Drive were notified regarding this application, and that the notification was strictly within 350 <br />feet of the proposed site. He explained that during the wintertime, this resident would be able to <br />see two billboards from his rear window, and would probably see the light as well. He stated all <br />of the residents who live on the north side of Laport Drive should have been notified. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated in his understanding, all of the properties on the north side of <br />Laport Drive that abut Highway 10 were notified. There are four properties that do not abut the <br />highway that may also be able to see the billboards. These four properties were not notified. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube indicated this property was the furthest from Highway 10, however, as it <br />extends into the cul-de-sac, the property protrudes outward, and all of the rear windows are <br />facing toward the billboards. He indicated that although this property was the furthest distance <br />from the golf course, it would have one of the better views of the billboards. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.