My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03-01-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
03-01-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:28:00 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:27:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 1, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 19 <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated the Planning Commission voted in favor of this resolution, <br />however, this does not indicate they are in favor of billboards, but rather that they must act in a <br />different capacity than they had during the previous consideration. <br /> <br /> <br />6. Planning Case No. ZC00-001 <br /> <br />Property Involved: Bridges Golf Course. <br />Consideration of Resolution 607-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Zoning Change <br />of Bridges Golf Course Parcels from I-1 and CRP to PF. <br />Applicant: City of Mounds View <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson gave the staff report as follows: <br /> <br />This item is consideration of Resolution 607-00, which is a resolution recommending approval <br />of the rezoning of Bridges Golf Course parcels from I-1, Industrial, and CRP, Conservancy, <br />Recreation, and Preservation, to the PF, Public Facilities Zoning District. In the course of <br />reviewing the City’s application for billboards on the golf course property, staff discovered that <br />the zoning of the golf course is not consistent with the City Code, in that golf courses are not <br />explicitly permitted uses within either the CRP or I-1 Zoning Districts. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated there has been some discussion on the part of City staff <br />members that the City initiated a rezoning action on this property several years earlier, however, <br />this had not taken place. He stated the proposed use is not in compliance with the zoning on the <br />golf course. He advised that the PF Zoning District allows golf courses as a permitted use, and <br />one of the parcels associated with the golf course is currently under the PF zoning designation. <br />He explained that the proposal before the Planning Commission would rezone those parts of <br />those parcels associated with the golf course from their existing CRP and I-1 zoning, to the PF <br />designation. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated Resolution 607-00 recommends to the City Council that <br />they adopt Ordinance 655, which approves the rezoning of the golf course parcels. He stated the <br />proposed PF zoning designation, is in keeping with the proposed Comprehensive Plan, whereas <br />the existing designation is not necessarily consistent with the Plan. He explained that this <br />proposal would clarify the fact that the use is not consistent with the Zoning Code, and also the <br />fact that those zoning designations would not be consistent with the proposed Comprehensive <br />Plan designation for these parcels. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated a portion of the wetland between the Sysco property and the <br />Industrial Park is currently zoned PF, as well as a portion of the golf course around the ninth <br />hole. He stated he believed Outlot A, of the North Star Industrial Park 2nd Addition, is currently <br />zoned I-1 and should be included in the rezoning as well. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.