Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mounds View Planning Commission March 1, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated he did not believe so. He indicated Superintendent <br />Hammerschmidt has been quite involved with the examination of the dimensions and the sign <br />spacing, and it was believed that these discussions would take place within the next few days. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle stated they had hoped there would be a meeting earlier in the week. He explained that <br />Paul Radamacher, a representative of DeLite Outdoor Advertising had undergone surgery the <br />previous week, and this has been the primary obstacle in this regard. He indicated he has been in <br />contact with City staff and the City Attorney on several occasions, and was satisfied there is a <br />good desire on the part of the City to resolve the issues, however, at this point, they have not <br />been practically worked out. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle indicated their fundamental concern at this point is that as a private property owner in <br />this process, they do not wish to be the ones who have to come before the City seeking a <br />variance. He stated it would be logical for the City, as the applicant, to attempt to have the <br />decisions regarding the sign facings made up front, so that neither of the applicants are in the <br />position of having to achieve the relatively difficult variance standard. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle advised that the City’s 1,000-foot spacing requirement is well in excess of MnDOT’s <br />requirement, therefore, there may be some options with regard to the spacing of the signs. He <br />explained that one option would be to apply this as an interior lot spacing requirement, in which <br />case the application presently before the Commission would be in compliance, because there is a <br />1,000-foot spacing between the proposed signs. He indicated this would also allow Sysco to <br />proceed with its two proposed signs, which are also spaced 1,000 feet apart, on an interior lot <br />basis. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle stated that with approximately 1,400 feet between the first sign on the furthest <br />northeast location of the golf course, to the sign located around the curve, and it was conceivable <br />that the average spacing measurement across those signs would be 1,000 feet, notwithstanding <br />the cross boundary spacing issue. He explained that this presents another potential means to <br />resolve the spacing issue. He noted that another option would be to decrease the 1,000-foot <br />spacing requirement. He explained that although this would probably require a Code <br />amendment, this could provide a solution, if it would allow the City to achieve the locations <br />proposed for the golf course, and also respect Sysco’s preferred locations, which are necessary <br />for its operational capabilities on the site. <br /> <br />Mr. Coyle stated as the Commission was aware, Sysco is a good neighbor to the community, and <br />their desire is to cooperate with the City in this matter, and they anticipate that with further <br />discussion, this would be the case. He indicated it was their hope that if the Commission took <br />any action on the application before them at that time, they would request the Council not take <br />any action relative to the golf course that would put the Sysco property at a disadvantage under <br />the Code. <br />