Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br /> Planning Associate Ericson indicated that staff is awaiting Rice Creek Watershed District <br />approval of the drainage plan for the site. He explained that once the watershed district is <br />comfortable regarding all of the drainage impacts, City staff, the City Engineer, and the Director <br />of Public Works would also be comfortable with regard to the drainage proposal. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated at this time, no plans have been submitted in terms of <br />landscaping on the site, and as indicated in the Staff Report, a significant number of trees and <br />landscaping will be removed with this expansion proposal. He explained that staff has concerns <br />that the overall character and environmental nature of this site will be drastically altered, and <br />therefore, has requested the applicant submit a landscape plan, which he believed was available <br />for presentation by the applicant at this time. He indicated the landscape plan would be <br />reviewed by staff and the City Forester, and brought back before the Planning Commission for <br />consideration at their next meeting. <br /> <br /> Planning Associate Ericson indicated another issue pertaining to the landscaping is the <br />screening on the site. He indicated that the Church owns two homes, one adjacent to the site at <br />7225 Knollwood Drive, and one, adjacent and to the east of the site, at 2824 County Road H2. <br />He stated these two homes would be removed to make room for the expansion, and the Church <br />parking lot would then be shifted down into these lots. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated staff has been contacted by residents adjacent to the site, <br />specifically, the property owner at 2816 County Road H2, whose property, after the removal of <br />the house on County Road H2, will be 40 feet from the parking lot. He explained that this <br />resident was unable to attend the meeting, however, would submit a letter expressing his <br />concerns for Planning Commission consideration at the next meeting. He explained that this <br />property owner indicated he would be much more comfortable with the proposed expansion if <br />some type of privacy fencing were to be installed. Planning Associate Ericson stated it was <br />within the purview of the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to this effect, adding <br />that with an appropriate landscaping plan and some screening, staff would be comfortable that <br />the concerns of the residents on the abutting properties would be addressed. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that there was some concern with regard to the lighting, and <br />staff has requested a photometric analysis of the site. He explained that while this analysis was <br />not available at the time the report was prepared, Staff received a copy of the analysis <br />afterwards, and finds it to be consistent with the City Code. He stated the lighting specifications <br />indicate the lights will be hooded and shielded from direct view so there would be no issues with <br />regard to glare, and the proposed light fixtures would be a decorative residential type of light. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the Church currently has six access points, with three curb <br />cuts on County Road H2 and three on Knollwood Drive. After the construction, the number of <br />access points would be reduced to five. He indicated staff has reviewed this matter with the <br />Director of Public Works, and in terms of access and circulation, this appears to be acceptable. <br />