Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission March 15, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 18 <br /> <br /> <br />in order to grant a variance. He added that although this is probably a larger lot than most in the <br />neighborhood, he has the impression from looking at the photograph that it is already overbuilt. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson advised that they must be very careful when considering corner lots, <br />where vehicles turn in both directions. He stated there are reasons the 30-foot setback <br />requirement is in place, however, the house appears to be setback 40 feet from the road, which <br />would probably provide a sufficient safety factor with the expansion. <br /> <br />Mr. Murlowski stated he agreed there were reasons for the 30-foot corner lot setback <br />requirement, in that they would not want a structure to encroach into the street and obstruct <br />traffic visibility. He stated the applicant’s house is situated on the lot with a 40-foot front yard <br />setback, and Park View Drive to the east actually curves away from the house, therefore, the <br />addition of 12 feet of structure would not obstruct visibility any more than the existing house <br />currently does. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this is an irregularly shaped corner lot however, he did not see much <br />difference from a normal corner lot as relates to the first criteria. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller stated she did not see any special circumstance presented with this lot. <br />Commissioner Johnson agreed. He added that this was not an older house, and a variance is <br />generally granted to improve situations found with the older smaller structures, in order to <br />upgrade the property. <br /> <br />Mrs. Magoris indicated the owner of Lot 4, two lots to the south of her property, requested a <br />variance that the residents opposed. She indicated this resident had a two-car garage, which he <br />basically doubled straight back into the lot. She stated this lowered the surrounding property <br />values by 5 percent, and although the residents were opposed to this, the City approved the <br />variance. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated this occurred on the property located at 7312 Park View Terrace, in <br />the early 1990’s. Mr. Millhouse indicated this garage extended beyond the side of the house, <br />and the expansion was not consistent with the original roofline of the structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired if this expansion would be approved if it were not being <br />proposed on a corner lot. Planning Associate Ericson stated yes, depending upon how much side <br />yard space was available. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated he would argue that this makes all corner lots exceptional. He <br />stated he realized there are rules for corner lots, however, the Commission should look at this <br />application in terms of the intent, the original setback of the property, and the equity of all <br />homeowners in the area. <br />