Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission April 5, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 5 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated in staff’s perspective, there are few adverse effects presented <br />by this proposal. He indicated staff has not received any complaints in recent history with regard <br />to the operation of the Church, and the proposed addition would benefit both the congregation <br />and the community. He advised that the expansion would match the architecture and style of the <br />existing building and should prove to be a good addition to the community. He stated that if <br />there are no other issues with regard to this request, staff recommends that the Planning <br />Commission direct staff to draft a resolution of approval for action at the next meeting. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated that the only matter that remains unresolved at this point is <br />the stormwater issue, as determined by the Rice Creek Watershed District, and this might not be <br />resolved for another month. He explained that the Watershed District would not issue a Wetland <br />Buffer Permit until the Church has retained a contractor, and final plans are submitted. The <br />applicant will not retain a contractor until it obtains City approval. He stated that in the interim, <br />he believed Rice Creek Watershed District would provide the City with some verbal indication <br />regarding whether or not the plans would satisfy their requirements. He indicated staff feels the <br />proposal is in order, and could be recommended on for Council review. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson opened the floor for public comment. <br /> <br />David Rudnik, 7191 Knollwood Drive inquired if a copy of the revised landscape plan was <br />available for public inspection. Planning Associate Ericson provided Mr. Rudnik with a copy of <br />the landscape plan. <br /> <br />Mr. Rudnik indicated that in his letter, he had brought forward an issue pertaining to traffic in <br />the area. He explained that some of the parishioners travel up from the south, on County Road <br />H, instead of making the trek from County Road H2, and occasionally on Sunday mornings, they <br />travel quite rapidly along Knollwood Drive. He requested that the Church ask the parishioners <br />to utilize the northerly route. He stated he would like time to review the final plans, and would <br />also request to be a part of the redesign process, so that he could have the opportunity to speak <br />with the Church regarding this proposal, in that his property is located one lot south of the <br />development. <br /> <br />Mr. Rudnik stated by and large, the Church has been a very good neighbor, however, there have <br />been some problems with a couple of the tenants who resided in one of their houses, and in this <br />sense, he views the demolition to be a positive thing. He explained that there have been some <br />domestic issues and some verbal abuse among spouses on more than one occasion, and this was <br />loud enough to be heard from inside their homes in the summertime. He inquired if the Church <br />plans to acquire additional properties as it grows, and whether or not they intend to use new <br />single family homes for these social programs. He explained that he does not wish to discourage <br />these programs, however, he would like to be certain there is proper social support for the <br />families the Church brings in. <br />