Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Plan <br />Planning Commission April 19, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />accommodate a future expansion, and install a stormwater holding pond on the property. There <br />is currently nothing on the site to accommodate the stormwater runoff, therefore, the addition of <br />the stormwater holding pond is viewed as a significant improvement, and will help to protect the <br />wetlands on the site. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this item was discussed at the March 15 and April 5 Planning <br />Commission meetings, during which, significant discussion was held regarding the impacts of <br />the proposed expansion and the fact that two houses adjacent to the facility would be removed <br />and replaced with the expanded parking lot. At the previous meeting, the Planning Commission <br />requested the landscape plan be revised to include additional screening and plantings on the site <br />to help mitigate this encroachment. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the landscape plan has been revised to indicate a row of <br />four to five-foot tall arborvitae on the northeast side of the property to provide additional <br />screening, and with the addition of trees at the south end of the site, the Planning Commission <br />felt that the landscape plan was adequate and met with Code requirements. The City Forester has <br />reviewed the revised landscape plan and has found that all of the proposed planting species are <br />consistent with City soils and the climate of the area. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated the parking requirements are met with the proposal, both <br />before and after the proposed expansion. He indicated that at one of the previous meetings, the <br />Planning Commission briefly touched upon an issue pertaining to the proposed 30-foot tall light <br />standards on the parking lot, which was brought forward by a resident located to the south of the <br />subject property on Knollwood Drive. He explained that this resident commented that these <br />light poles would be quite tall, and seemingly out of place in this residential neighborhood. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated staff reviewed the issue and made reference to the lighting <br />of the Wynnsong Theater located on Highway 10. He explained that residents south of the <br />theater on County Road H2 successfully lobbied to have the parking lot lights nearest County <br />Road H2 be no taller than 20 feet. Staff has spoken with the lighting engineer who indicated the <br />height of the proposed light standards could be reduced, however, there would be some trade off <br />in terms of the number of light standards that would be required to meet the lighting needs of the <br />facility. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated it was staff’s contention that something must be done with <br />regard to the lighting, as this is strictly a residential neighborhood. He explained that while the <br />Church has been present at this site for a number of years, the proposed expansion of the parking <br />lot would bring it closer to the other properties, and the new parking lot lights would create an <br />encroachment into the nighttime calm and peace that the neighborhood currently enjoys. He <br />advised that the resolution before the Planning Commission contains a stipulation that the <br />lighting plan be revised to indicate that the light standards be 24 feet in height or less, with lesser <br />intensity lumens than the presently proposed 400 watt bulbs. He explained that staff was not <br />certain if it would be possible to lower the intensity of the lights, however, the height of the light