My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-17-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
05-17-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:29:58 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:29:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission May 17, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that the plot plan was not to scale. Chairperson Peterson <br />stated the proposed setback would be 8 feet from the property line, and therefore, there was no <br />issue in this regard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated he would propose that the Commission include the condition <br />that the shed be removed, as this was an opportunity to bring the property into conformity. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired what type of roofline would be utilized for the garage. <br /> <br />Kenneth Waste, the applicant stated his brother-in-law was a draftsman, and would assist in the <br />construction of the garage. He indicated they would attempt to construct the front of the garage <br />to match the house. He stated the roofline would probably be the same height as the front of the <br />house, and would peak toward the rear of the structure. He added that there would also be a <br />small storage space, however, it would not be utilized as living quarters or anything of this <br />nature. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if doors or windows were proposed along the western side of the <br />garage. Mr. Waste stated there would be nothing on the west side, however, there would be a <br />service door on the east side of the structure, and at the back, facing north, there would be a nine- <br />foot garage door. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired if there would be a service door to enter the home. Mr. Waste <br />stated there would be one service door to access the house, and one in the back to enter the <br />garage from the backyard. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired if the applicant was proposing a 9-foot roll up door in back of <br />the garage. Mr. Waste stated this was correct. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson requested clarification regarding the purpose of this door. Mr. Waste <br />stated he would use this door to access the garage with his riding lawnmower, which has a 48- <br />inch cut. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired if the applicant intended to store items in the backyard. Mr. <br />Waste stated he planned to store everything in the garage. He explained that he had a 24-foot <br />boat, two snowmobiles, and riding lawnmower, and other items for storage. He stated he was <br />not a mechanic. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson pointed out that concerns of this nature were often raised, and <br />understandable. He stated this appeared to be a good opportunity to improve the property, obtain <br />the necessary space, and remove a couple of non-conformities in the process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.