Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission May 17, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 24 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Wiley stated this was acceptable, adding that it was better to address this issue at this time, <br />rather than later. He stated they would recommend the Commission approve the applicant’s <br />proposal, in light of his intentions, which appear to be more toward improvement than profit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson stated the resolution should contain a stipulation pertaining to the <br />removal of the shed, which should be included in the fourth WHEREAS clause. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson inquired if the Commission desired to amend the language in <br />Stipulation 2 of the resolution to indicate “shall” rather than “may.” The Commission concurred. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated the intent of this was that if there were an issue, it could be <br />reviewed, and a opportunity to correct it would be made, however, if the problem could not be <br />corrected, this was a legal means to remedy the situation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden advised that the conditional use permit would run with the property. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 6 Nays – 0 The motion carried. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated this item has been scheduled for a public hearing at the May <br />22, 2000 City Council meeting. <br /> <br />10. Staff Reports / Items of Information <br /> <br />a. Previous Council Actions <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated at the Special Council Work Session the <br />previous Monday, there was discussion regarding the Community Development Department and <br />its priorities in preparing a work plan over the next year and a half. He stated there was an <br />exercise for staff to identify the major activities within the six areas the Community <br />Development Department deals with. He indicated both the Council and staff rated the results of <br />this exercise, and the items that came forward as high priorities were the Highway 10 <br />Redevelopment Plan and the Zoning Code update. He advised that the Zoning Code update was <br />rated the highest priority by the City Council, and both of these items would ultimately affect the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke provided the Commission with copies of the discussion <br />for their information and review, and to determine if there were other issues that had not been <br />addressed. He indicated staff would like the Commission’s input, so that they might incorporate <br />this into their work plan as well. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated staff has been working with Springsted & <br />Associates on the process for the Highway 10 study, and has discussed this with the Council as <br />well, to ensure that they were proceeding in the proper direction. He explained that the study has <br />been refocused at this point, to spend less time discussing the issues which have been well