Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 7, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 10 <br /> <br /> <br />property several times and changed its Comprehensive Plan. He explained that at one time, the <br />property was zoned commercial, and other times it was zoned residential, and the timing has <br />never been quite right for Mr. Videen. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired regarding the current zoning of the property. Mr. Moses stated <br />that it was zoned B-3, Commercial. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired how far the large trees on Highway 10 were from the property <br />line, and if they could be saved rather than removed. <br /> <br />Mr. Cunningham indicated that the trees generally begin in the area that has been delineated as <br />wetland, to the east of the proposed development. He stated that they have obtained delineations <br />of both the wetland and tree line, and could provide this information to staff and the Planning <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired regarding 3 or 4 large trees located between the new and old <br />Edgewood Drive. She stated that according to the plans that were provided, it appears that these <br />would be eliminated with the construction of the proposed parking lot. Mr. Cunningham stated <br />that those trees would be included in the development scheme. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that the developer could indicate the location of those trees on <br />the site plan, in relationship to the proposed lots, buildings, and parking lot, and bring that <br />forward at the next meeting of the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden stated that if this item were to move forward, the wetland area would be <br />zoned Planned Unit Development. He inquired if this could be zoned Open Space later in the <br />process, or possibly made into a park, so that the residents could be certain that the upland <br />behind their homes would not be developed. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that staff would request the City Attorney’s opinion in this <br />regard. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that the Conservancy, Recreation and Preservation designation <br />might be an appropriate zoning for this property. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Jopke stated that the Outlot site is designated as a natural <br />Open Space in the Comprehensive Plan, and this would provide some protection against future <br />development. He added that through the Planned Unit Development process, the only thing <br />allowed to occur on that property would be exactly what is approved on the plan, and the <br />property would be specified as Open Space on the plan, which would provide protection from <br />that standpoint. He advised that if the proposed land swap occurs, the City would own the <br />property, and therefore, a number of protections would be in place to maintain the property as it <br />exists. <br />