Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 7, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson requested clarification. Mr. Akerman stated that the intersection on <br />Highway 10 appears to be 12 to 15 feet narrower in the center than it is on the outside on either <br />side of the highway. He explained that vehicles traveling north or south on Highway 10 have to <br />make a tight turn to go through the intersection, and then must adjust their vehicles to enter the <br />proper lane. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated that it appeared from the site plan that Edgewood Drive accesses <br />Highway 10 at a slight angle. He suggested this portion of the Highway 10 redevelopment might <br />involve moving those medians back. <br /> <br />Mr. Akerman stated that a left hand turn lane should be added because there is currently a right <br />hand turn lane or a lane that goes through and turns to the left on Edgewood Drive, and if there is <br />traffic coming in the opposite direction, this creates somewhat of a traffic jam for vehicles <br />attempting to go in both directions. He stated that he particularly noticed this in the mornings <br />and evenings, when there is increased traffic in the area. He added that the road adjacent to the <br />Theater has become somewhat of a shortcut for vehicles that drive through the neighborhoods <br />rather that taking County Road H-2 to Highway 10. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson advised that this issue could be addressed now that there is more control <br />over the light timing. He indicated there would be a longer light timing, because one of the <br />points that was made was that there was no way to cross the highway on one light, and <br />representatives of the Department of Transportation literally had to run to make it halfway across <br />the highway. He stated that he was not certain if the intersection could be widened, as this was <br />one of the new LED lights, however, many things would now be possible. <br /> <br />Mr. Ackerman stated that there would be more potential for an accident with this development, <br />particularly in terms of traffic coming off of Highway 10 or from the ball field, and perhaps the <br />developer could arrange for a turn lane with this project, to safeguard against problems in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Mr. Moses stated that with regard to crossing the highway, this was comparable to a problem the <br />railroads were experiencing in that trains are deceiving and appear to be slow moving because of <br />their large size. He explained that highways and freeways are similar in that they do not appear <br />to be a great distance to cross until you are actually in the process, and he believed an <br />educational process was necessary with regard to perception, such as that utilized by the <br />railroads. <br /> <br />James Faracy, 5298 St. Stephen Street stated that it would make more sense for the City to <br />purchase the entire parcel because it is a piece of property that does not exist anywhere else, and <br />he believed the City should have taken action to obtain that property. He inquired what <br />assurances the residents on St. Stephens Street have that the developable 3.5 acres would not be <br />developed in the future. <br />