My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-07-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
06-07-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:30:27 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:30:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 7, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />creating additional storm water holding ponds so that it could accommodate some additional <br />storm water that is currently going untreated into the Highway 10 storm sewer system. He added <br />that this would allow for the possibility of reducing, if not eliminating, the potential for <br />downstream flooding. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson indicated the storm sewer located under Edgewood Drive and <br />County Road H2 was not sized accordingly for the amount of flow it takes in, and therefore, <br />during heavy rainstorms, there is some backing up of storm water . He stated that it was hoped <br />that all of the storm water coming down Edgewood Drive could be diverted into the new storm <br />water holding pond, which would have an overflow that would allow it to come back out if <br />necessary. He pointed out that the larger, perhaps two-acre, storm water holding pond would be <br />beneficial in terms of the City’s Local Water Management Plan, and the recharge of the system. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that there are two sign easements on the proposed site. He <br />indicated that in his understanding, the billboard on one of the sites was by permanent lease <br />arrangement, and would remain on the property unless the lease was purchased from the <br />leaseholder. He stated that Midland Videen representative, Terry Moses, could further address <br />this matter. He explained that the other sign easement is adjacent to the intersection of old <br />Edgewood Drive and Highway 10, and was dedicated to the previous owners of the Community <br />Center, the Bel Rae Ballroom. He stated that the City Attorney was researching this lease <br />document to determine if the City purchased that sign easement in conjunction with the purchase <br />of the Bel Rae Ballroom, in which case, this might involve a simple process of vacating that <br />easement area. He explained that if the sign easement did not transfer with the property during <br />this transaction, the City might have to condemn it. The applicant is requesting that part of this <br />area be utilized for signage for the Culver’s Restaurant, which would not have Highway 10 <br />frontage, and may not have sufficient visibility from the roadway. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated that further information regarding the ownership of the sign <br />easement would be available at the next meeting of the Planning Commission, at which time, the <br />applicant would bring forward the Preliminary Plat and the final site plan, which would specify <br />all of the dimensions, as well as any other information the Commission feels is necessary. He <br />explained that the site plan would indicate the proposed trailways on the Midland Videen site <br />and along Highway 10, as well as extension of the existing sidewalk along Edgewood Drive to <br />Highway 10. He stated that the photometric analysis would also be presented at the next <br />meeting, and if there were any recommendations pertaining to the landscape plan or other issues, <br />those matters would be brought before the Commission at that time. He indicated this was a <br />public hearing, and that staff sent out literally hundreds of notifications, due to the size of the <br />subject development area. <br /> <br />Dave Kepler, 5314 St. Stephen Street inquired why the City needed the proposed development. <br />He stated that there was a Walgreens Drugstore four miles away in Northtown, and another in <br />Lexington. He stated that he did not wish to see this area developed, and he did not see the need <br />to continue developing every piece of undeveloped land. He indicated he has lived in Mounds <br />View for 12 years, and has walked through the proposed site, where there are deer. He pointed
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.