Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission June 21, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 17 <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated three numbers have been considered for garage sizes in the past <br />three years, including 864, 952 and 1,000 square feet. He inquired which size the Commission <br />was considering at this point. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated a 952 square foot garage would be allowed, as long as the <br />footprint of the house is 952 square feet, and if the footprint were less than this, a Conditional <br />Use Permit would be required. He explained that a 600 square foot house could not have a 952 <br />square foot garage, therefore, Chairperson Peterson has suggested everyone be allowed 864 <br />square feet without a Conditional Use Permit. He added that if a property owner desired 1,400 <br />square feet, he would be required to obtain a Conditional Use Permit because this would exceed <br />the footprint of the house. He stated this would provide a safeguard against accessory structures <br />that appear out of place and do not fit in with the character of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired how a property owner could obtain 1,400 square feet if he could <br />not exceed 400 square feet. Commissioner Laube explained that they would not state that they <br />could exceed 400 square feet, however, anything over that amount would require a Conditional <br />Use Permit. Community Development Director Jopke pointed out that by allowing additional <br />structures, the property owner could obtain 1,400 square feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas stated that if the current limit is 952 square feet, and a Conditional Use <br />Permit would be required after that point, they should just leave the maximum at 952 square feet <br />for all property owners. She inquired why we would desire to revert to the previous 864 square <br />foot requirement when they have already stated that everyone could have 952 square feet. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that some properties would not accommodate 952 square <br />feet. Commissioner Thomas stated she was aware of this. She indicated she was not in favor of <br />basing the square footage on the footprint of the house, and this provision should be eliminated. <br />She stated all property owners should be allowed 952 square feet, and the City should not revert <br />to 864 square feet. She indicated a 600 square foot house was already experiencing a garage <br />problem, and the property owner should be allowed to have 952 square feet. She added that the <br />limit on the size of the shed should be eliminated, and there should be a maximum of 1,400 <br />square feet of accessory structure. She stated the issues to be dealt with pertained to how to <br />approach the amount between 952 square feet and 1,400 square feet, and this would depend upon <br />the size of the lot and the number of accessory buildings, and would allow for much more <br />flexibility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube inquired regarding the dimensions of a 1,400 square foot building. He <br />pointed out that a 952 square foot building would be almost as large as a three-car garage. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated that if the garage was 952 square feet, the accessory structure <br />could be 448 square feet, which is essentially the size of a standard 24 by 24 foot garage. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson stated only a property with the lot area to support a 1,400 square foot <br />structure would be able to obtain that size building. He explained that if there was a very large