My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-21-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
06-21-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:30:41 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:30:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission June 21, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 22 <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson advised that this could give rise to a situation in which that large <br />garage cuts off a supply of light and air to the neighboring properties, and these are criteria that <br />the Commission is required to examine through the Conditional Use Permit process. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson stated presently, the structure is allowed to be five feet from the property <br />line, and a 1,400 square foot building with the appropriate roofline could very easily block the <br />access to light to neighboring properties. He stated they would have to include some safeguards <br />against negative impacts to the neighbors. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller requested clarification regard the height restriction on sheds. Planning <br />Associate Ericson stated accessory structures that are not attached to a house have always been <br />limited to 15 feet in height. Chairperson Peterson pointed out that this was not a peak height, but <br />rather half way up the side of the structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube stated a large garage of 26 by 50 feet could have an extremely high roof. <br /> <br />Planning Associate Ericson explained that if there was a steep pitch to the large garage, the roof <br />could theoretically be 20 feet high. He indicated that if the structure is larger than 952 square <br />feet, the City currently has the opportunity to review this, and ensure that there are no impacts to <br />the neighbors and the community. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired how many Conditional Use Permit requests the Commission has <br />denied. She pointed out that if the requests are not being denied, residents should not be <br />required to go through the process. <br /> <br />Commissioner Laube inquired if the current Code prohibits a property owner from having a <br />garage larger than three stalls. Planning Associate Ericson stated this was correct. <br />Commissioner Laube stated a structure 952 square feet in size would be as large as a three-car <br />garage, and if they went any larger than that, they would be allowing four or five car garages. <br />He stated you could easily construct a structure 20 feet deep by 47 feet on the property, and that <br />would be 48 to 50 feet wide, and this would be possible if 1,400 square feet without a <br />Conditional Use Permit were allowed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas suggested they allow the property owner 952 square feet, and as many <br />accessory buildings as desired without a Conditional Use Permit, so long as the total accessory <br />storage does not exceed 1,400 square feet, however, a single structure would not be allowed to <br />exceed 952 square feet without a Conditional Use Permit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland stated although it would be likely, this would allow for a 50-foot long <br />tunnel of a garage. Commissioner Laube stated he would want a five-car garage if he had three <br />vehicles to store in the back, and two to drive, and he would wish to have the garage located next <br />to the house and heated. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.