07-19-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 12 Planner Ericson stated the City Attorney also commented on the use of the word “allotted” and agreed with the suggestion to use the word “allowed.” Commissioner Miller referred to the language on Page 3, subdivision. b, and asked if the Fire Code should be mentioned when there is only a 3-foot separation. She also asked whether a special fire wall is required. Planner Ericson stated the Zoning Code requires a 6-foot separation but the Building Code requires a 3-foot separation. He stated that staff will verify the Fire Code requirement and make the appropriate correction, if needed. Chairperson Peterson suggested the Fire Marshal also be asked about the issue of eave separation. MOTION/SECOND: Hegland/Kaden to approve Resolution 624-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of Proposed Ordinance 664, an Ordinance Amending Title 1100, Chapter 1106, Regarding Permitted and Conditionally Permitted Accessory Buildings; Special Planning Case SP-079-00. Ayes – 7 Nays - 0 Motion carried. Planner Ericson advised that a public hearing has been scheduled before the City Council on July 24, 2000 9. Special Planning Case SP-075-00 Discussion and Review of Proposed Ordinance 663, an Ordinance Creating Language to Administer and Regulate Tattoo and Body Piercing Establishments Planner Ericson gave the staff report as follows: The City Council placed a 6-month moratorium prohibiting any tattoo shops or body piercing establishments to be located in the City. The 6-month period will expire on August 14, 2000. The proposed ordinance creates licensing requirements and adds minimal language to the Zoning Code as to the appropriate zoning designations in which such a use could be located. Planner Ericson noted the memorandum from the City Attorney’s office providing feedback. He advised that a copy was also provided to the Police Chief and the Assistant to the City Administrator. He stated this ordinance was based on a City of Richfield ordinance and revised to fit the City of Mounds View in all references. Planner Ericson noted the memorandum from Bob Vose and recommendation that there be no spacing requirements from other types of uses since there is no documentation saying these types of uses are inappropriate or should be a certain distance from a school, church, etc. He stated at this point the only separation language being contemplated is a 1,000 foot separation from other such establishments. Accordingly, Planner Ericson recommended a revision to Page 11,