My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-19-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
07-19-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:31:23 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:31:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission July 19, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Dan Hall, representing The Mermaid, is requesting City approval of a general concept plan to <br />construct a 97-room hotel and a 500-seat banquet center to be attached to and integrated with the <br />existing complex. <br /> <br />The general concept plan is the first stage of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. If the <br />City approves the concept plan, the developer would then prepare the balance of the submittal <br />(landscaping, detailed site plans, drainage, signage, elevations, photometric analysis, etc.) for <br />city consideration, which is referred to as the development stage of the PUD. Both stages <br />(concept and development stages) require a public hearing. The final stage of the PUD is the <br />administrative approval. A public hearing notice was published in the newspaper and notices <br />mailed to all property owners within 350 feet of the subject properties for this meeting. In <br />addition to the PUD, the applicant has also applied for a major subdivision, which would <br />combine all of the subject properties into one platted parcel (presumably, Lot 1, Block 1, <br />Mermaid Addition). Action on the major subdivision is not scheduled at this meeting. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson noted the comprehensive plan does designate this as a mixed unit/Planned Unit <br />Development so this application would be consistent with that designation and the zoning. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson noted there have been several submittals identifying the parking and building <br />configuration. He advised that Perkins has decided to not renew their lease so that property will <br />be included in this project. The Mermaid also closed on the rental property and applied for a <br />demolition permit for that property. The Music Off 10 property and part of the business park <br />property that provides the access from Highway 10 will also be incorporated in this project. <br />Planner Ericson explained that as part of the project, all the parcels would be combined and the <br />access drive location shifted to the west to allow for contiguous parking on the site. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson stated there is a small holding pond on the business park property that would be <br />relocated as part of a larger regional storm water pond that would be constructed on the school <br />district and metro waste property. Planner Ericson noted the City was awarded a grant to assist <br />with the development of the regional pond. The Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed the <br />project, as has the City Engineer, County Engineer, Metropolitan Council Waste Management <br />Division, and all are pleased to see the storm water pond be installed. He advised that currently, <br />all of the water drains, unfiltered, from this site directly into Rice Creek so it is a benefit to divert <br />the water into a settlement pond and assure the water going into Rice Creek is treated. It would <br />also reduce the spikes of water inflow into the Creek during heavy storms. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson reviewed the proposed parking of 972 spaces, noting 977 parking stalls are <br />required by Code, but since this is a PUD, the City can consider the complementary uses this <br />development would have to determine the appropriate number of parking spaces. He noted the <br />required parking setbacks and pointed out that the site plan identifies a 1-foot setback from <br />County Road H. Staff would recommend that be changed to a 5-foot setback. He noted there <br />appears to be room on the site to accommodate this 5-foot setback. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson stated the Ramsey County Traffic Engineer indicated no objection to a trail on <br />County right-of-way but the applicant inquired regarding the need for a trail in this location. He <br />stated this issue could be worked out during the process. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.