My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-13-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
09-13-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:32:32 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:32:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission September 13, 2000 <br />Special Meeting Page 12 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Planner Ericson clarified it is for the parking lot being on the Tom Thumb side. He also <br />explained a variance is not required because the setback is five feet from Tom Thumb and that <br />part does not need to be in the resolution. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked Exhibit A to be changed to reflect the changes discussed tonight <br />when the resolution is revised. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson said Exhibit A could be the same as last week’s but the parking lot portion <br />is changed to reflect decisions of the Commission at this meeting. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson said there is no notation of fences or trees as that will be determined at a later <br />date during the development review stage of this proposal. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson said contingencies must be recorded with the county and development <br />review must take place within three months in order to be valid. He said they could add a <br />sentence that says screening and fencing would have to be resolved at that time as well, but it is <br />not totally necessary. <br /> <br />Commissioners Thomas and Miller said they did not believe it to be necessary as there is a <br />sentence saying failure to apply for and receive approval will render the variance null and void. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson asked if there was further discussion on the resolution or the changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller asked if they need to edit the sentence which states the public hearing was <br />held on Wednesday, September 6, 2000 to add the discussion was continued to September 13, <br />2000. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson said he does not know if this is legally a public hearing but they could certainly <br />indicate the matter was discussed at the September 13, 2000 meeting. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson said he doesn’t think the public hearing was continued from September 6, <br />2000 to September 13, 2000. He said he would like to add a sentence saying the issue was <br />discussed at the meeting on September 13, 2000. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson said he will change the resolution to read “a public hearing was held regarding <br />this variance request on Wednesday, September 6, 2000 and the discussion was continued to <br />September 13, 2000.” <br /> <br />MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Heglund. To approve Resolution No. 633-00, a Resolution <br />Approving a Parking Lot Setback Variance for Tony Mezzenga, 7664 Greenfield Avenue with <br />the changes as requested by the Commission. <br /> <br /> Ayes – 7 Nays - 0 Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson indicated without the development review nothing can legally be done on <br />the property and the next step at this point would be to work up the plans as to where to put the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.