My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
10-18-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:33:09 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 18, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Staff recommends approval of Resolution 638-00, a resolution recommending approval of the <br />Mermaid Addition preliminary plat, subject to the following stipulations: The Preliminary plat <br />shall be revised by indicating the current property owners and appropriate legal descriptions for <br />the involved parties. The developer shall execute a sign easement document which dedicates to <br />the City of Mounds View the forty-foot triangle at the corner of Highway 10 and County Road H <br />as shown on the preliminary plat for a City gateway sign. The developer shall submit the <br />applicable park dedication fee of $92,306 prior to the City signing the final plat. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson noted if Resolution 638-00 is approved by the Planning Commission it would <br />then be presented to Council for approval. <br /> <br />The applicant was not present. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson inquired as to whether the applicant was aware a park dedication fee <br />would be required. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated the applicant was made aware of the requirement for a park dedication <br />fee earlier in the process and was quoted a somewhat lower figure. Planner Ericson indicated the <br />applicant may request some consideration on the fee. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to whether the original quote for the park dedication fee <br />included the Perkins property. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated it did but said the original quote for the park dedication fee was based <br />on 1999 values while the current figure is based on Year 2000 values. In addition, the original <br />quote did not include the portion of the business park property that is included in the plat. <br />Altogether this amounted to a 12 percent increase. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller noted the reference to Highway 10 in the legal description was <br />inconsistent. In some instances U.S. Highway 10 was used and in other instances Trunk <br />Highway No. 10 was used. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated this is the legal description as it stands and once the plat is approved <br />all references to Highway 10 are eliminated and there is no longer a problem with consistency. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas inquired as to the difference in the first quote for the park dedication fee <br />and the present quote for the park dedication fee. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated the first quote for the park dedication fee was approximately $82,000. <br /> <br />Chairperson Peterson inquired as to the logic behind the additional the right-of-way dedication <br />on the north side of County Road H in front of the Music Off 10 Parcel. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated the City did not require that and said the Mermaid did that on their <br />own. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.