My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-18-2000
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
10-18-2000
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/28/2018 8:33:09 AM
Creation date
8/28/2018 8:33:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
MV Minutes
GOVBOARD
Planning Commission
DOCTYPE
minutes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mounds View Planning Commission October 18, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 6 <br /> <br /> <br />Commissioner Berke indicated he would prefer to limit the number of vehicles not the number of <br />days in a row. <br /> <br />A consensus was reached that the Commission would like to see the stipulation for “off street” <br />parking removed from the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland inquired if there was regulation for lighting the signs for home <br />businesses. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated there was not, as property owners are allowed to use decorative <br />lighting and to aim lights at the house or a sign. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to what provisions would be made for existing signs. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated it would be difficult to determine what signs were in place before the <br />ordinance was changed. He also said Staff is familiar with the City and that most of the signs in <br />the City would comply with the four square feet provision in the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson inquired as to whether two-sided signs were in violation of the four <br />square footage of sign requirement. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated two-sided signs were allowed under the Code. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson asked the Commission if there should be allowances for signs if the sign would <br />not be visible from the street if attached to the structure. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas indicated she would like to make a provision for signs not visible from <br />the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he too would like to make a provision for signs not visible <br />from the street. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hegland indicated he would be fine with a provision for signs not visible from the <br />street provided the sign was far enough from the property line so as not to create a nuisance for <br />the neighbors. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated he would prefer the signs be placed within five feet of the front <br />property line. <br /> <br />Commissioner Stevenson indicated he would prefer the signs be placed within five feet of the <br />property line that abuts the street right-of-way. Thereby allowing people with road frontage on <br />two sides of their property to choose where they wish to place the sign. <br /> <br />A consensus was reached to allow signage within five feet of the property line that abuts a street <br />right-of-way. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.