Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View Planning Commission November 15, 2000 <br />Regular Meeting Page 3 <br /> <br /> <br />Planner Ericson inferred that home-based businesses were defined separately under the City <br />Code. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kaden inquired as to how wind speed pressure could be determined for a sign. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated the City would rely on the sign companies to provide signs that met <br />City Code requirements. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson told the Commission it is not the intent of Staff to make changes to the sign <br />ordinance that would make most signs in the City nonconforming. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson indicated that R-4 and R-5 zoning are larger parcels and requirements for <br />allowable real estate “for sale” signs should possibly be changed to allow a larger, 32 square-foot <br />sign which seems to be the industry standard. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated that Staff removes the small advertising signs such as “weight loss” <br />“work from home” and other nuisance advertising from telephone poles to prevent others from <br />thinking Mounds View allows such advertising. Garage sale signs, he added, are treated <br />differently. Information is printed in the newsletter each spring concerning sign etiquette and <br />courtesy for garage sales. <br /> <br />Commissioner Miller inquired as to whether there was a place in the code defining Christmas <br />tree sales within the City and signage allowed for that. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated that there are guidelines for Christmas tree sales lots which include <br />information on allowable signage. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson asked the Commission whether they wanted to invite local business owners to <br />come to the planning and discussion meetings on the sign ordinance or if the Commission would <br />prefer to come up with a draft of possible changes to the sign code and then have one meeting <br />where business owners could review and make comment on the code changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas indicated she felt it would be a good idea to switch Ground Signs and <br />Temporary Signs on the schedule to accommodate the holiday rush times for business owners. <br /> <br />It was the consent of the Commission to notify local business owners of the meetings to discuss <br />proposed changes to the sign ordinance and to inform them there will be a business owner’s <br />forum on February 7, 2001 should they wish to participate in any or all of the meetings. It was <br />also the consent of the Commission to switch Ground Signs and Temporary Signs on the <br />timeline. <br /> <br />Commissioner Thomas noted it may be necessary to define the requirements for a sign such as <br />the Carmike sign that is oriented at a 45 degree angle. <br /> <br />Planner Ericson indicated that issue could be looked at during the redrafting of the sign code. <br />