12-06-2000 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mounds View Planning Commission December 6, 2000 Regular Meeting Page 3 2. The applicant shall revise the survey to indicate five-foot perimeter drainage and utility easements around both lots, except lot lines abutting Eastwood Road and County Road J, which shall indicate ten-foot easements; 3. The applicant shall arrange to execute and to record the drainage and utility easement documents with Ramsey County; and 4. The applicant shall be responsible for the drafting, execution and recording of a utility easement document granting in the favor of Parcel A the south 15 feet of Parcel B for sanitary sewer access. Said document shall be reviewed by the City Attorney and a copy shall be placed on file with the City for reference. Mr. Cary was present at the meeting and offered to answer any questions the Planning Commission had. Commissioner Miller requested a couple of minor typographical corrections to the Resolution. Community Development Director Ericson indicated the Resolution number may be incorrect and asked for the latitude to be able to correct it if necessary. Consent was reached to allow Staff to insert the correct Resolution number if necessary. MOTION/SECOND: Johnson/Miller. To Approve Resolution 641-00, a Resolution Recommending Approval of a Minor Subdivision of 8480 Eastwood Road. Ayes – 7 Nays – 0 Motion carried. [Editor’s note: The correct resolution number is 642-00.] 6. Discussion of Ordinance 672 Regarding Home Occupations Community Development Director Ericson addressed the Planning Commission and indicated this ordinance had been discussed at previous meetings and a recommendation had been sent on to Council for approval. The ordinance changes were discussed at a Council work session prior to being heard at the Council meeting on November 13, 2000. At the November 13, 2000 Council meeting there was considerable public input expressing concern for changes to the ordinance and Council sent the ordinance back to the Planning and Zoning Commission for further consideration. The major item at issue is whether to allow non-resident employees within a home-based business. Community Development Director Ericson indicated he had sent an email concerning the proposed changes to Ordinance 672 to those Mounds View Residents for whom he had email addresses. The overwhelming majority of those surveyed by email expressed the desire to leave the code as it stands and not to change it to allow non-resident employees.