Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Planning Commission Resolution No. 584-99 <br />August 18, 1999 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Mounds View Planning Commission has considered the provisions from <br />Section 1125.0l(1)e of the Zoning Code regarding possible adverse effects of the proposed use and <br />makes the following findings: <br /> <br />(1) Relationship to Municipal Comprehensive Plan. <br />(2) The geographical area involved. <br />(3) Whether such use will tend to or actually depreciate the area in which it is proposed. <br />(4) The character of the surrounding area. <br />(5) The dcmonstrated need for such use. <br /> <br />The Comprehensive Plan designates this site as Mixed Use PUD, which would be consistent <br />with the proposed R-4 zoning ofthis site. Such a facility would help meet the housing needs <br />of a particular segment of the community. The property is located between commercial sites <br />to the north and a high density residential development and park to the south. The proposed <br />use would act as a buffer between the existing land uses. The proposed style and architectural <br />design of the proposed facility would blend into and add character to this area. <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following findings that the <br />general criteria for CUP approval in Subdivision 1125.01 (2) have been met: <br /> <br />(1) The use will not crcate an excessive burden on existing parks, schools, streets and other public <br />facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> <br />It is not expected that this use will have any impact on parks, schools, streets and other <br />public facilities and utilities which serve or are proposed to serve the area. <br /> <br />(2) The use will be sufficiently compatible or separated by distance or screening from adjacent <br />residentially zoned or used land so that existing homes will not be depreciated in value and therc will be <br />no deterrencc to development of vacant land. <br /> <br />This development, while not ahutting any residential property, would be sufficiently <br />compatihle with the existing land uses and would not cause any foreseeable depreciation in <br />neighboring property values. <br /> <br />(3) The structure and site shall have an appearance that will not have an adverse effect upon adjacent <br />residential properties. <br />The architectural renderings presented to the Planning Commission and puhlic show a well <br />designed and aesthetically pleasing building. <br /> <br />(4) Thc use, in the opinion ofthc City Council, is reasonably related to the overall needs of the City and <br />to the existing land use. <br /> <br />The demand for assisted living facilities such as the one proposed is growing to <br />accommodate an aging population. <br />