Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Resolution 631-00 <br />September 6, 2000 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the purpose of the variance provision in the Zoning Code is to give relief to <br />property owners when the strict enforcement of the zoning code requirements imposes a hardship <br />thereby restricting the improvement of property due to practical difficulties brought about by <br />unique or extraordinary features of the physical property that are beyond the property owner's <br />control; and, <br /> <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Municipal <br />Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be <br />satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br />finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the property <br />located at 8141 Edgewood Drive to warrant the approval of a variance for a 25-foot front yard <br />setback for a proposed house addition, and makes the following findings of fact related to its <br />decision: <br /> <br />1. Exceptional or extraordinary circumstances apply to 8141 Edgewood Drive which do not <br />apply generally to other properties in the same zone or vicinity in that the home was <br />constructed in 1946, 25 feet from the street and 14 years before the adoption of the <br />Zoning Code. <br /> <br />2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of <br />rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district under the terms of this <br />Title. <br /> <br />3. The variance request is the result of factors over which the applicant has had no control. <br /> <br />4. Granting the variance to allow for a 25-foot front yard setback would allow the applicant <br />to make improvements to his house consistent with the existing building and rooflines. <br />Approval would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege denied to others in <br />the same district. <br /> <br />5, The Planning Commission finds that the requested 25-foot setback is the minimum <br />variance that would alleviate the applicant's hardship. <br /> <br />6. Granting a variance for a reduced front yard setback for the proposed house addition <br />would not be materially detrimental to the purpose of this Title or to other property in the <br />same zone. <br /> <br />7. A 25-foot setback would not impair a supply of light or increase congestion, nor would it <br />increase the danger of fire or endanger the public safety or diminish property values. <br />