Laserfiche WebLink
Mounds View City Council June 12. 1989 <br />Regular Meeting Page Four <br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br />Motion/Second: Wuori/Quick to approve the consent <br />agenda, as corrected, and waive the reading of the <br />resolutions. <br />4 ayes 0 nays <br />There were no residents requests or comments fromi <br />the floor . <br />Mayor Hankner closed the regular meeting and opened <br />the next public hearing at 7:35 PM. <br />Clerk/Administrator Pauiey reviewed the proposed <br />modifications which related to the amendment to the <br />plan adopted for tax increment financing for the <br />Mounds View Business Park. Everest Development has <br />requested tax increment financing for Mounds View <br />Business Park South. The City has not approved that, <br />and this amendment would allow the City to negotiate <br />that item and does not represent approval. Pursuant <br />to State. law, the amendment must be made by June 30. <br />• Glenda Burrows, resident of the corner of O'Connell <br />Drive and Woodale, presented a petition to Mayor <br />Hankner, signed by residents of the area who are <br />against the extension of Woodale and the wetland <br />alteration permit. <br />Mayor Hankner accepted the petition and explained it <br />was appropriate for the next public hearing. She <br />stated there are already two other tax increment <br />financing projects in the City, Mounds View <br />Business Park North and Sysco. The Council has <br />taken the stance that they will not go beyond 15 <br />years with tax increment financing on projects. <br />Bill Buckingham, 5220 Greenfield, asked for an expla- <br />nation of tax increment financing. <br />Clerk/Adminis rator Pauley explained what it is, <br />and stated that the theory is that without it, <br />development would not occur, and it is a method of <br />competing with other areas for development, which <br />ultimately will bring increased tax dollars into the <br />City, as well as other taxing jurisdictions. <br />Motion Carried <br />7. Residents <br />Requests and <br />Comments from <br />the F loor <br />8. Public Hearing: <br />Proposed Modi- <br />f ication of <br />Dvlpt. District <br />No. 2 and Proposes <br />Modification of <br />Tax Increment <br />Financing District <br />No. 1 <br />Mr. Buckingham stated he felt the City was giving <br />up revenue in the short run, as well as the County <br />and School District. <br />