My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
764-04
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
764-04
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/4/2007 3:01:16 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:37:35 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />... <br /> <br />.~ ... <br /> <br />a. <br />b. <br />c. <br />d. <br />e. <br />f. <br />g. <br /> <br />Planning Application <br />Zoning Map <br />Location Map <br />Photographic documentation <br />Proposed Layout <br />Proposed Elevations <br />Staff Report <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing <br />regarding the variance and conditional use permit requests on Wednesday, July 7, <br />2004. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mounds View Planning <br />Commission makes the following findings of fact related to the conditional use permit <br />request: <br /> <br />1. Other than the width, the proposed oversized 1,125 square foot garage <br />satisfies the dimensional requirements as outlined in Chapters 1104 and 1106 <br />the Zoning Code. <br /> <br />2. The request is consistent with the Mounds View Comprehensive Plan in that <br />the Comprehensive Plan encourages the development and maintenance of <br />residential areas so as to improve the quality, appearance and attractiveness of <br />housing units and residential property in general. <br /> <br />3. The proposed garage would not be out of place given the character and <br />geography of the surrounding area involved and the size of the subject property <br />which is able to accommodate such a structure. <br /> <br />4. The proposed garage would not depreciate the neighborhood. <br /> <br />5. The applicant has sufficiently demonstrated that a need exists for the <br />proposed oversized garage. <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mounds View <br />Planning Commission makes the following findings of fact related to the variance <br />request: <br /> <br />1. The property is located just off of a cul-de-sac and is located on Spring Lake. <br />The irregularly shaped lot and the desire to preserve the view of Spring Lake limit <br />the possible locations of accessory buildings. The proposed garage allows the <br />homeowner to have only one accessory structure, which is planned to be located <br />as far from Spring Lake as possible. In addition, a utility easement limits the <br />depth of the proposed garage. <br /> <br />2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the <br />applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in that most property <br />owners could have up to three accessory buildings, but due to the constraints of <br />the lot, the applicant has limited options. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.