823-06 to 857-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MOUNDS VIEW PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 856-06 CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW COUNTY OF RAMSEY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR 91.5 SQUARE FEET OF ADDITIONAL EXTERIOR BUILDING SIGNAGE AT 5150 QUINCY STREET; PLANNING CASE NO. VR2006-010 WHEREAS, the applicant, Mr. Tim Hill with C.G. Hills & Sons, has applied for a variance from the maximum wall-mounted signage allotments for the building located at 5150 Quincy Street; and, WHEREAS, Section 1008.09 of the Sign Code indicates that the maximum wall- mounted signage for an industrial building is 100 square feet per business occupant; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Hill requests an additional 91.5 square feet of signage; and, WHEREAS, Section 1008.16 of the Sign Code indicates that variance requests be treated as any other variance request as articulated in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View Zoning Code; and, WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission makes the following finding of facts related to this request: 1. The building at 5150 Quincy Street is in need of additional exterior wall- mounted signage on the east building elevation to provide enhanced visibility adjacent to larger developments which may obscure the subject property. 2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in that the City has approved similar variances in the past for reasonable sign variance requests. 3. The special conditions or circumstances necessitating the variance request do not result from the actions of the applicant. 4. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owner a special privilege in that every property owner has the right to apply for a variance to improve the function and viability of their business. Neither would such approval confer a special treatment as similar reasonable variances have been granted in the past.