Laserfiche WebLink
~ ~~ ~ <br />~~ <br />~ ~ <br />Mounds View City Council August 27, 1990 <br />Regular Meeting Page Seven <br />Mayor Hankner stated that 1 vote was taken <br />to accept the resignation at a legal meeting. <br />Mayor Hankner then stated again that she _ <br />wished she could share the whole situation <br />with everyone but because of the Data Privacy <br />Act she could not and this act is designed <br />to protect employees from public scrutiny. <br />Mr. McCarty agains states confusion on his <br />part and wants the Council to clear up his <br />confusion. He states that Mr. Karney and <br />Mr. Meyers were taken out of the picture <br />because of conflict of interest and that they <br />had no part in the process but the paper <br />quoted the Council was given advice by <br />three attorneys. <br />Mayor Hankner explains the situation <br />regarding the 3 attorneys again. She <br />reiterates that they all handled seperate <br />components of the situation. <br />(~W~ City Attorney Karney had nothing to do <br />with the contract because when he and <br />City Attorney Meyers were contacted about <br />the issue they didn't want to be involved <br />because of a conflict of interest. They recommended <br />Ms. Nolan's firm to the Council and hired <br />her. Ms. Dale Nolan handled all issues from <br />that point on. <br />Mr. Barney stated he was called on 1 or <br />2 times to interpret the City Code by <br />Ms. Nolan. <br />Mr. McCarty asked again, then who were the other <br />two attornees? <br />Mayor Hankner again replied, " Mr. Karney and <br />~~ <br />and Mr. Meyers. Initially Mr.Karney and Mr. <br />Meyers were consulted with regards to the issue <br />but all negotiations were handled by Ms. Nolan who <br />advised Mr. Karney, Mr. Meyers and the Council. <br />Mayor Hankner stated that Mr. Karney and Mr. Meyers were not <br />totally divorced from the situation. <br />• <br />