My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
899-09 to 920-09
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
899-09 to 920-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 3:05:21 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:39:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Resohition 920-09 <br />Page 2 <br />WHEREAS, according to Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code, the Planning Commission is to review a standard set of criteria, of which <br />all must be satisfied, in order to grant a variance to the Zoning Code. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission finds <br />that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient hardship with regard to the <br />property located at 2280 County Road I, and makes the following findings of fact related to <br />its decision: <br />1. Circumstances apply to this property in that the west property line is not straight <br />since there is a garage on the adjoining property around which the property line <br />jogs. This jog cuts out the southwestern corner of the property, creating an odd <br />shaped parcel. <br />2. The literal interpretation of the provisions of the Zoning Code would limit the <br />applicanYs ability to have an adequate length entrance driveway into the car wash. <br />3. The applicant had no control over the placement of the garage, or the actions of the <br />people he hired to design and build the car wash. <br />4. Granting this variance would not confer upon the applicant a special privilege in that <br />the odd lot shape due to the neighbor's garage is a pre-existing condition. <br />5. The zero (0) foot variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the <br />applicanYs hardship. <br />6. Granting a variance to allow for a driveway with a zero-foot setback would not be <br />detrimental to the purpose of the Zoning Code, in that the area between the car <br />wash and the neighbor's garage is almost completely taken up by the driveway. <br />Whether or not there is 5 feet of rock or 10 feet of rock between the edge of the <br />driveway and the garage would not make much difference as this area is not used <br />by the neighboring property owner. The car wash has opened with the zero-foot <br />setback and it is causing no adverse impacts. <br />7. Granting the variance would not impair an adequate supply of light or air to the <br />adjoining property. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.