Laserfiche WebLink
Resolu#ion ,923-9O <br />Pagc� 2 <br />1. The exceptional or extraordinary conditions relating to the variance request is that <br />the house was constructed closer to the south property line, which causes limitations <br />as to how the garage can be improved. <br />2. The literal interpretation of the Zoning Code would restrict the property owner's <br />ability to expand and improve upon the layout and functionality of the home. <br />3. The owner is requesting the variance due to the house placement, a factor over which <br />the applicant had no control. <br />4. Granting a variance to allow for the two-foot side yard setback would allow the <br />applicant to have a two-car garage in order to park his vehicles indoors, resulting in <br />a better appearance for the neighborhood. <br />5. Granting the variance would not confer upon the property owners a special privilege <br />denied to others in the same district due to the unique nature of the existing <br />condition present on the site. <br />6. The two-foot setback is the minimum variance that would alleviate the applicanYs <br />hardship. <br />7. The construction of the new garage would not be materially detrimental to the <br />purpose of the Zoning Code or to other property in the R-1, Single-Family <br />Residential zoning district. <br />8. A two-foot setback would not impair the supply of light or increase congestion, nor <br />would it diminish property values, increase the danger of fire or endanger the public <br />safety. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning <br />Commission, based upon the above findings, approves the variance request of Richard <br />Wyatt, 7515 Knollwood Drive, to allow for a garage with a two-foot setback from the south <br />property line. <br />Adopted this 7�" day of July, 2010. <br />Gary Stev�pson, <br />ATTEST: <br />Roberts, Community Development Director <br />(SEAL) <br />