My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
956-12 TO 974-12
MoundsView
>
Commissions
>
Planning & Zoning Commission
>
Resolutions
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
956-12 TO 974-12
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 2:19:19 PM
Creation date
8/29/2018 5:40:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
� Resolution 957-12 <br />Page 2 <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Mounds View Planning Commission <br />finds that the criteria as identified in Section 1125.02, Subdivision 2 of the Mounds View <br />Municipal Code are satisfied and finds there to be sufficient practical difficulty with <br />regard to the property located at 2975 County Road 10, and makes the following <br />findings of fact related to its decision: <br />1. The general intent of the Zoning Code is to limit commercial properties from <br />constructing very large accessory buildings. Granting the variance would be in <br />harmony with the purpose of the code. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the applicant is <br />significantly improving the entire property and can store company vehicles <br />indoors. <br />3. The applicanYs business has a truck and two trailers and some supp�ies that <br />could be stored indoors for security and aesthetics. He is a conscientious <br />business owner located in a residential neighborhood, and wants the property to <br />look nice by being able to store vehicles and supplies inside. <br />4. The commercial building on this lot is quite small which limits the ability to build a <br />garage big enough for more than one vehicle. The property is zoned B-3, <br />Highway Business which is a higher intensity use. <br />5. The detached garage is no bigger than other garages in the entirely residential <br />neighborhood, and the existing building will be remodeled which will greatly <br />enhance the neighborhood. The new office use would be a much better fit in the <br />residential neighborhood than the auto-related uses that have been on this site <br />since 1959. <br />6. The 21 percent variance is the minimum variance required to alleviate the <br />applicanYs practical difficulty and be able to store the few vehicles that the <br />applicanYs company owns. <br />7. The Planning Commission may impose conditions upon the premises as may be <br />necessary to comply with city standards and to minimize the effect of such <br />variance upon other properties in the neighborhood. <br />< <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.